Cohesion Policy and Economic Growth in EU Regions

Abstract EU Cohesion Policy (CP) absorbs roughly one-third of the EU budget. This article reviews the causal evidence on the effects of CP on the economic growth and convergence of EU regions. The verdict is positive but modest: GDP multipliers are around one euro of output per euro spent, on average. Heterogeneities are substantial, however: positive effects concentrate in regions with adequate institutions and human capital, and largely dissipate once funding stops, pointing to demand-side rather than structural transformation effects in most recipient areas. A key finding from recent work is that CP funds crowd out national public investment while crowding in private investment, yielding a total investment multiplier of well above one which is, however, concentrated in non-tradeable sectors. These findings collectively argue for a reformed CP focused on well-targeted investment spending in fiscally constrained regions with credible implementation capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Economists Voice
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2026-0050
Primary Topic
Regional Development and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Cohesion Policy and Economic Growth in EU Regions

Zareh Asatryan
The Economists Voice
Regional Development and Policy
article

Cohesion Policy and Economic Growth in EU Regions

Zareh Asatryan
article en

Abstract

Abstract EU Cohesion Policy (CP) absorbs roughly one-third of the EU budget. This article reviews the causal evidence on the effects of CP on the economic growth and convergence of EU regions. The verdict is positive but modest: GDP multipliers are around one euro of output per euro spent, on average. Heterogeneities are substantial, however: positive effects concentrate in regions with adequate institutions and human capital, and largely dissipate once funding stops, pointing to demand-side rather than structural transformation effects in most recipient areas. A key finding from recent work is that CP funds crowd out national public investment while crowding in private investment, yielding a total investment multiplier of well above one which is, however, concentrated in non-tradeable sectors. These findings collectively argue for a reformed CP focused on well-targeted investment spending in fiscally constrained regions with credible implementation capacity.

The Economists Voice
Centre for European Economic Research (DE), University of Münster (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Regional Development and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cohesion Policy and Economic Growth in EU Regions — Zareh Asatryan · The Economists Voice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS