Entrepreneurship Awareness as a Mediating Mechanism: Understanding How Entrepreneurship Education Influences Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions at South African Universities

This study examines entrepreneurial awareness as a mediating mechanism in the relationship between entrepreneurship education and students’ entrepreneurial intentions. It further investigates whether this mediation pathway differs across contrasting university environments in South Africa. A quantitative cross-sectional design was adopted. Data were collected from 263 undergraduate students enrolled in entrepreneurship courses at two public universities in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, the University of KwaZulu-Natal (urban context) and the University of Zululand (rural context). The data were analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling, with multigroup analysis (MGA) employed to examine contextual differences across institutional environments. Entrepreneurship education significantly and positively predicted both entrepreneurial awareness ( β = 0.530, p < .001) and entrepreneurial intentions ( β = 0.488, p < .001). However, entrepreneurial awareness did not significantly predict entrepreneurial intentions ( β = 0.030, p = .708) and did not mediate the education–intention relationship. This pattern, whereby education successfully develops awareness without that awareness translating into stronger intentions, is discussed as the awareness paradox. MGA revealed suggestive contextual differences, with urban contexts showing stronger direct educational pathways, though these differences did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance. To the authors’ knowledge, this study provides one of the first empirical examinations of entrepreneurial awareness mediation across contrasting urban and rural university contexts in South Africa. The findings suggest that awareness development and intention formation may represent parallel rather than sequential outcomes of entrepreneurship education, a pattern termed the awareness paradox. This provisional finding invites further theoretical investigation and replication in other contexts. Findings are limited to undergraduate students at two universities within a single South African province and rely on cross-sectional, self-reported data. Educators and curriculum designers should not rely on awareness-raising activities alone to develop entrepreneurial intentions. Experiential learning, practical skill development and confidence-building interventions appear more directly effective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23939575261484332
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Entrepreneurship Awareness as a Mediating Mechanism: Understanding How Entrepreneurship Education Influences Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions at South African Universities

Elizabeth Oluwakemi Ayandibu, Ayansola Olatunji Ayandibu
Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
article

Entrepreneurship Awareness as a Mediating Mechanism: Understanding How Entrepreneurship Education Influences Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions at South African Universities

Elizabeth Oluwakemi Ayandibu, Ayansola Olatunji Ayandibu
article en

Abstract

This study examines entrepreneurial awareness as a mediating mechanism in the relationship between entrepreneurship education and students’ entrepreneurial intentions. It further investigates whether this mediation pathway differs across contrasting university environments in South Africa. A quantitative cross-sectional design was adopted. Data were collected from 263 undergraduate students enrolled in entrepreneurship courses at two public universities in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, the University of KwaZulu-Natal (urban context) and the University of Zululand (rural context). The data were analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling, with multigroup analysis (MGA) employed to examine contextual differences across institutional environments. Entrepreneurship education significantly and positively predicted both entrepreneurial awareness ( β = 0.530, p < .001) and entrepreneurial intentions ( β = 0.488, p < .001). However, entrepreneurial awareness did not significantly predict entrepreneurial intentions ( β = 0.030, p = .708) and did not mediate the education–intention relationship. This pattern, whereby education successfully develops awareness without that awareness translating into stronger intentions, is discussed as the awareness paradox. MGA revealed suggestive contextual differences, with urban contexts showing stronger direct educational pathways, though these differences did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance. To the authors’ knowledge, this study provides one of the first empirical examinations of entrepreneurial awareness mediation across contrasting urban and rural university contexts in South Africa. The findings suggest that awareness development and intention formation may represent parallel rather than sequential outcomes of entrepreneurship education, a pattern termed the awareness paradox. This provisional finding invites further theoretical investigation and replication in other contexts. Findings are limited to undergraduate students at two universities within a single South African province and rely on cross-sectional, self-reported data. Educators and curriculum designers should not rely on awareness-raising activities alone to develop entrepreneurial intentions. Experiential learning, practical skill development and confidence-building interventions appear more directly effective.

Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies
University of Zululand (ZA), Department of Commerce (AU)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.