Unleashing the potential of pre-trained language model in multi-dimensional writing assessment: towards more robust and explainable scoring
Abstract Rapid advancements in education assessment and natural language processing have fundamentally transformed the methodologies employed in multi-dimensional writing assessment. Neural network approaches have shown remarkable effectiveness, obviating the need for handcrafted feature engineering. However, the potential of pre-trained language models for constructing multi-dimensional automated essay scoring (AES) models still needs to be explored. The present study addresses critical challenges, including the resilience of AES models to subtle input perturbations leading to prediction inaccuracies and the elucidation of the intricate mechanisms within deep learning frameworks. We propose an integrated approach leveraging multi-task learning and the pre-trained model Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT), augmented with adversarial training via the Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM), aiming to enhance scoring accuracy and stability in multi-dimensional AES tasks. Findings reveal that BERT-Integrated-MTL-FGSM significantly outperforms existing baselines. Integrating Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) elucidates the complex evaluation processes within the deep learning black box, offering potentially diagnostic feedback for students and assisting educators in delivering individualized instruction guided by word-level attributions across diverse analytic rating scales. These insights enhance the robustness, generalizability, and interpretability of multi-dimensional AES models, thus paving an interdisciplinary pathway for multi-dimensional writing assessment and instruction.
Authors
- Xiaoyi Tang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7084-5768)
Institutions
- University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Natural language processing.
- Published
- 2026-09-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1017/nlp.2026.10037
- Primary Topic
- Writing and Handwriting Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00