PIR-SBFR: A Calibration-Free Sensor-to-Inference Routing Interface for Aerial Optical Object Detection

Aerial detection requires fine detail for small targets and broad context for large structures. Sampling loss, blur, and noise can weaken detail without changing feature-map resolution, creating a demand–reliability mismatch. We present Physical Imaging Reliability-Guided Scale-Biased Feature Reweighting (PIR-SBFR), a sensor-to-inference interface that separates scene-scale demand from observation reliability. A visual branch estimates demand, while a fixed analytic rule converts relative sampling, sharpness, noise, and field availability into an ordered multiscale prior. The routing rule requires no sensor-specific response fitting. On public DIOR images, ten paired runs increase average precision (AP) from 62.98% (SD 0.32) to 65.52% (SD 0.40). On the study-specific AI-TOD-v2 split, AP rises from 29.58% (SD 0.27) to 32.10% (SD 0.41). Matched local reproductions of three contemporary tiny-object detectors reach 30.42–31.59% AP under the same protocol. PIR-SBFR also improves three compatible host detectors by 2.09–2.54 percentage points. All 27 controlled quality conditions and nine held-out degradation types favor PIR-SBFR. On a Jetson Orin NX, its FP16 end-to-end median latency is 19.55 ms. These results demonstrate effective acquisition-conditioned routing under controlled observation changes on public aerial imagery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26185985
Primary Topic
Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

PIR-SBFR: A Calibration-Free Sensor-to-Inference Routing Interface for Aerial Optical Object Detection

Xiaoyu Dong, Jingchao Liu, Zhirui Xue, Zixin Wang et al.
Sensors
Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
article

PIR-SBFR: A Calibration-Free Sensor-to-Inference Routing Interface for Aerial Optical Object Detection

Xiaoyu Dong, Jingchao Liu, Zhirui Xue, Zixin Wang, Zizheng Zhao, Junhao Hu, Chengxin Zhu
article en

Abstract

Aerial detection requires fine detail for small targets and broad context for large structures. Sampling loss, blur, and noise can weaken detail without changing feature-map resolution, creating a demand–reliability mismatch. We present Physical Imaging Reliability-Guided Scale-Biased Feature Reweighting (PIR-SBFR), a sensor-to-inference interface that separates scene-scale demand from observation reliability. A visual branch estimates demand, while a fixed analytic rule converts relative sampling, sharpness, noise, and field availability into an ordered multiscale prior. The routing rule requires no sensor-specific response fitting. On public DIOR images, ten paired runs increase average precision (AP) from 62.98% (SD 0.32) to 65.52% (SD 0.40). On the study-specific AI-TOD-v2 split, AP rises from 29.58% (SD 0.27) to 32.10% (SD 0.41). Matched local reproductions of three contemporary tiny-object detectors reach 30.42–31.59% AP under the same protocol. PIR-SBFR also improves three compatible host detectors by 2.09–2.54 percentage points. All 27 controlled quality conditions and nine held-out degradation types favor PIR-SBFR. On a Jetson Orin NX, its FP16 end-to-end median latency is 19.55 ms. These results demonstrate effective acquisition-conditioned routing under controlled observation changes on public aerial imagery.

SensorsVol. 26(18)
Xijing University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.