Augmenting rhythm: a scoping review of technologies and feedback modalities in elite sport

Abstract Rhythm—the precise timing and harmonious flow of movement—is a determinant of success in elite sports but remains difficult to train using traditional, subjective coaching methods. Human augmentation technologies offer a pathway to objectify and train this complex skill through real-time feedback. This scoping review, conducted in line with the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews and the Joanna Briggs Institute Population–Concept–Context framework, maps a segment of the sports-engineering and human-augmentation technology literature (2000–2025) to identify technologies and feedback modalities that show potential for supporting rhythm training in high-performance contexts. Synthesizing data from 129 technology-focused studies retrieved from Scopus, ACM Digital Library, and IEEE Xplore, the review characterizes how rhythm-relevant information is currently operationalized within this literature, which is defined by the ubiquity of wearable sensing and the rapid emergence of immersive technologies. Across the included studies, the corpus skews towards wearable sensors (48.8% of studies) and visual feedback displays (81% of studies). Within this technology-focused corpus, a notable disconnect is observed: most reported systems target novice populations using discrete kinematic metrics rather than the holistic temporal parameters relevant to elite performance. Furthermore, while reporting quality is generally high (e.g., > 93% of studies clearly state aims), a validation challenge persists, with nearly 20% of included works lacking formal evaluation. This paper articulates four challenges in this technology-focused literature—including the scarcity of elite-context evidence and limited alignment between sensory modality and task demands—and outlines exploratory, hypothesis-generating directions for future human augmentation technologies in sports engineering.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Sports Engineering
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-026-00562-7
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Augmenting rhythm: a scoping review of technologies and feedback modalities in elite sport

Matt Ingram, Stephan Lukosch, Md. Tanvir Hossain, Robert W. Lindeman
Sports Engineering
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Augmenting rhythm: a scoping review of technologies and feedback modalities in elite sport

Matt Ingram, Stephan Lukosch, Md. Tanvir Hossain, Robert W. Lindeman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Rhythm—the precise timing and harmonious flow of movement—is a determinant of success in elite sports but remains difficult to train using traditional, subjective coaching methods. Human augmentation technologies offer a pathway to objectify and train this complex skill through real-time feedback. This scoping review, conducted in line with the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews and the Joanna Briggs Institute Population–Concept–Context framework, maps a segment of the sports-engineering and human-augmentation technology literature (2000–2025) to identify technologies and feedback modalities that show potential for supporting rhythm training in high-performance contexts. Synthesizing data from 129 technology-focused studies retrieved from Scopus, ACM Digital Library, and IEEE Xplore, the review characterizes how rhythm-relevant information is currently operationalized within this literature, which is defined by the ubiquity of wearable sensing and the rapid emergence of immersive technologies. Across the included studies, the corpus skews towards wearable sensors (48.8% of studies) and visual feedback displays (81% of studies). Within this technology-focused corpus, a notable disconnect is observed: most reported systems target novice populations using discrete kinematic metrics rather than the holistic temporal parameters relevant to elite performance. Furthermore, while reporting quality is generally high (e.g., > 93% of studies clearly state aims), a validation challenge persists, with nearly 20% of included works lacking formal evaluation. This paper articulates four challenges in this technology-focused literature—including the scarcity of elite-context evidence and limited alignment between sensory modality and task demands—and outlines exploratory, hypothesis-generating directions for future human augmentation technologies in sports engineering.

Sports EngineeringVol. 29(2)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Augmenting rhythm: a scoping review of technologies and feedback modalities in elite sport — Matt Ingram, Stephan Lukosch, et al. · Sports Engineering (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS