Perceived barriers to research productivity among medical residents in Angola: an exploratory cross-sectional study

Abstract Background Research engagement during postgraduate medical training develops critical appraisal, data analysis, and scientific writing skills and supports locally relevant knowledge production. Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa indicates that research expectations during training are often undermined by limited infrastructure, mentorship, and protected time. This study described the research profile of resident physicians in Angola, identified perceived barriers to research productivity, and characterized the incentives considered most useful. Methods We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional online survey of resident physicians in active specialty training in Angola in July 2026. Data covered sociodemographic characteristics, research training and experience, mentorship, institutional support, 15 Likert-scale barrier items, publication incentives, and open-ended responses. Descriptive statistics and exploratory bivariate analyses with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used. Results Of 85 responses, 84 were analyzed. Mean age was 33.2 years (SD 5.6); 52.4% were female. Although 54.8% reported formal methodological training and 82.1% intended to submit a manuscript within 12 months, only 11.9% had a previous publication and 33.3% were engaged in a current project. The most endorsed barriers were the perception that protected time and mentorship would increase participation (69.0%), difficulty with biostatistics and data analysis (60.7%), and difficulty with scientific writing (57.1%). The most valued incentives were methodological training (82.1%), mentorship (66.7%), and statistical support (61.9%). Current project participation was associated with receiving feedback, high research interest, previous project participation, and conference presentation; previous publication was associated with previous project participation; and intention to submit was associated with residency year 3 or above. Conclusions Among Angolan residents, research interest and intention substantially exceed actual scholarly output. Strengthening productivity is likely to depend less on appeals to individual motivation and more on institutional support, including mentorship, applied methodological training, statistical support, and protected time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10446-w
Primary Topic
Health and Medical Research Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Perceived barriers to research productivity among medical residents in Angola: an exploratory cross-sectional study

Sérgio Neto
BMC Medical Education
Health and Medical Research Impacts
article

Perceived barriers to research productivity among medical residents in Angola: an exploratory cross-sectional study

Sérgio Neto
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Research engagement during postgraduate medical training develops critical appraisal, data analysis, and scientific writing skills and supports locally relevant knowledge production. Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa indicates that research expectations during training are often undermined by limited infrastructure, mentorship, and protected time. This study described the research profile of resident physicians in Angola, identified perceived barriers to research productivity, and characterized the incentives considered most useful. Methods We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional online survey of resident physicians in active specialty training in Angola in July 2026. Data covered sociodemographic characteristics, research training and experience, mentorship, institutional support, 15 Likert-scale barrier items, publication incentives, and open-ended responses. Descriptive statistics and exploratory bivariate analyses with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used. Results Of 85 responses, 84 were analyzed. Mean age was 33.2 years (SD 5.6); 52.4% were female. Although 54.8% reported formal methodological training and 82.1% intended to submit a manuscript within 12 months, only 11.9% had a previous publication and 33.3% were engaged in a current project. The most endorsed barriers were the perception that protected time and mentorship would increase participation (69.0%), difficulty with biostatistics and data analysis (60.7%), and difficulty with scientific writing (57.1%). The most valued incentives were methodological training (82.1%), mentorship (66.7%), and statistical support (61.9%). Current project participation was associated with receiving feedback, high research interest, previous project participation, and conference presentation; previous publication was associated with previous project participation; and intention to submit was associated with residency year 3 or above. Conclusions Among Angolan residents, research interest and intention substantially exceed actual scholarly output. Strengthening productivity is likely to depend less on appeals to individual motivation and more on institutional support, including mentorship, applied methodological training, statistical support, and protected time.

BMC Medical Education
Clínica Sagrada Esperança (AO)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Health and Medical Research Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.