Kant’s Argument that Mathematics is the Science of Magnitude: Comments on Daniel Sutherland’s Kant’s Mathematical World

Abstract The main claims of Kant’s Mathematical World are that for Kant mathematics is a science of magnitudes, the world of experience is a world of magnitudes, and there is an essential role for intuition in representing magnitudes. This paper critically examines the argument for these main claims. It articulates an eight-step “Master Argument” that connects magnitude to mathematics through a series of intermediary concepts. Some of these steps are left unclear in Kant’s Mathematical World , and I argue that the book’s silence on syntheticity and the role of intuition in proof is a partial cause for this unclarity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Philosophy
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2026.10096
Primary Topic
Historical Philosophy and Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Kant’s Argument that Mathematics is the Science of Magnitude: Comments on Daniel Sutherland’s Kant’s Mathematical World

Jeremy Heis
Canadian Journal of Philosophy
Historical Philosophy and Science
article

Kant’s Argument that Mathematics is the Science of Magnitude: Comments on Daniel Sutherland’s Kant’s Mathematical World

Jeremy Heis
article en

Abstract

Abstract The main claims of Kant’s Mathematical World are that for Kant mathematics is a science of magnitudes, the world of experience is a world of magnitudes, and there is an essential role for intuition in representing magnitudes. This paper critically examines the argument for these main claims. It articulates an eight-step “Master Argument” that connects magnitude to mathematics through a series of intermediary concepts. Some of these steps are left unclear in Kant’s Mathematical World , and I argue that the book’s silence on syntheticity and the role of intuition in proof is a partial cause for this unclarity.

Canadian Journal of Philosophy
University of California, Irvine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Historical Philosophy and Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.