Accuracy of Combined Osteotomy Guides and Patient-Specific Implants in Le Fort I Segmental Osteotomy Requiring Alveolar Bone Reduction

Background: Segmental Le Fort I osteotomy combined with interdental alveolar bone reduction is a technically challenging procedure, and the accuracy of patient-specific implants (PSIs) in this setting has not been well established. This study aimed to assess the three-dimensional (3D) repositioning accuracy and safety of 3D-printed osteotomy guides used in conjunction with PSIs for this complex surgical procedure. Materials and Methods: This retrospective consecutive case series included 19 patients who underwent segmental Le Fort I osteotomy with alveolar bone reduction in the premolar region. For all patients, 3D-printed osteotomy guides and PSIs were designed using virtual surgical planning (VSP). Postoperative CBCT reconstruction models were superimposed on the VSP models to assess accuracy based on 3D deviations of skeletal and dental landmarks, angular discrepancies, and dental arch morphology. Residual intersegmental alveolar gaps and perioperative complications were also evaluated. Results: Signed and absolute coordinate deviations of all landmarks were within the 2 mm reference margin. Signed coordinate deviations differed significantly among the X-, Y-, and Z-axes (p < 0.05), with the X-axis showing the smallest mean deviation (0.064 ± 0.753 mm). The overall Euclidean spatial error was 1.477 ± 0.519 mm. Anterior maxillary segments exhibited significantly greater sagittal and vertical deviations than posterior segments (p < 0.05). The overall mean residual intersegmental alveolar gap was 0.681 ± 0.153 mm, with the buccal gap at the root apex significantly larger than the corresponding palatal gap (p < 0.05). Two minor dentin injuries occurred, neither of which resulted in clinical pulpal or periodontal complications during the available follow-up. Conclusions: The combined use of osteotomy guides and PSIs facilitates accurate 3D maxillary repositioning in segmental Le Fort I osteotomy involving alveolar bone reduction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15187316
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Accuracy of Combined Osteotomy Guides and Patient-Specific Implants in Le Fort I Segmental Osteotomy Requiring Alveolar Bone Reduction

Zili Li, Xiaojing Liu, Ling Wu, Xinyu Xu
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Accuracy of Combined Osteotomy Guides and Patient-Specific Implants in Le Fort I Segmental Osteotomy Requiring Alveolar Bone Reduction

Zili Li, Xiaojing Liu, Ling Wu, Xinyu Xu
article en

Abstract

Background: Segmental Le Fort I osteotomy combined with interdental alveolar bone reduction is a technically challenging procedure, and the accuracy of patient-specific implants (PSIs) in this setting has not been well established. This study aimed to assess the three-dimensional (3D) repositioning accuracy and safety of 3D-printed osteotomy guides used in conjunction with PSIs for this complex surgical procedure. Materials and Methods: This retrospective consecutive case series included 19 patients who underwent segmental Le Fort I osteotomy with alveolar bone reduction in the premolar region. For all patients, 3D-printed osteotomy guides and PSIs were designed using virtual surgical planning (VSP). Postoperative CBCT reconstruction models were superimposed on the VSP models to assess accuracy based on 3D deviations of skeletal and dental landmarks, angular discrepancies, and dental arch morphology. Residual intersegmental alveolar gaps and perioperative complications were also evaluated. Results: Signed and absolute coordinate deviations of all landmarks were within the 2 mm reference margin. Signed coordinate deviations differed significantly among the X-, Y-, and Z-axes (p < 0.05), with the X-axis showing the smallest mean deviation (0.064 ± 0.753 mm). The overall Euclidean spatial error was 1.477 ± 0.519 mm. Anterior maxillary segments exhibited significantly greater sagittal and vertical deviations than posterior segments (p < 0.05). The overall mean residual intersegmental alveolar gap was 0.681 ± 0.153 mm, with the buccal gap at the root apex significantly larger than the corresponding palatal gap (p < 0.05). Two minor dentin injuries occurred, neither of which resulted in clinical pulpal or periodontal complications during the available follow-up. Conclusions: The combined use of osteotomy guides and PSIs facilitates accurate 3D maxillary repositioning in segmental Le Fort I osteotomy involving alveolar bone reduction.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(18)
National Clinical Research (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.