Efficacy of HER2-targeted therapy in early breast cancer 2008–2020 in Sweden in the real-world setting

Abstract Large-scale real-world evidence on outcomes in HER2-positive (HER2 +) early breast cancer (EBC) remains limited. We investigated overall survival (OS) and its prognostic factors in patients with HER2+ EBC. We here analyzed data from 4,638 patients with HER2 + EBC diagnosed between 2008 and 2020, retrieved from the Swedish National Quality Register for Breast Cancer across four regions in southern Sweden. Associations between demographic, clinical, pathological variables, year of diagnosis, and OS were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. The median age at diagnosis was 57 years (interquartile range 47 – 65). On multivariable analysis, age > 75 years (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] = 2.61, P < 0.001), advanced tumor stage (T4 vs. T1; AHR = 4.30, P < 0.001), node-positive disease (AHR = 1.94, P < 0.001), and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC vs. invasive ductal carcinoma; AHR = 1.59, P = 0.024) were independently associated with worse OS. In contrast, premenopausal status (AHR = 0.52, P < 0.001), radiotherapy (AHR = 0.59, P < 0.001) and treatment with modern HER2-targeted therapies (AHR = 0.70, P = 0.032) were associated with improved OS. Stratified analyses demonstrated that ILC and year of diagnosis were prognostic only in estrogen receptor (ER)-negative disease, whereas the survival benefit of modern HER2-targeted therapy was confined to ER-positive disease. In conclusion, OS in HER2 + EBC has improved over time, reflecting advances in HER2-targeted therapies and comprehensive multimodal treatment strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-71336-1
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Efficacy of HER2-targeted therapy in early breast cancer 2008–2020 in Sweden in the real-world setting

Jenny Nyqvist, Zakaria Einbeigi, Alexios Matikas, Daniel Giglio et al.
Scientific Reports
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Efficacy of HER2-targeted therapy in early breast cancer 2008–2020 in Sweden in the real-world setting

Jenny Nyqvist, Zakaria Einbeigi, Alexios Matikas, Daniel Giglio, Alaa Haidar, Nils Wilking, Malin Rimskog
article en

Abstract

Abstract Large-scale real-world evidence on outcomes in HER2-positive (HER2 +) early breast cancer (EBC) remains limited. We investigated overall survival (OS) and its prognostic factors in patients with HER2+ EBC. We here analyzed data from 4,638 patients with HER2 + EBC diagnosed between 2008 and 2020, retrieved from the Swedish National Quality Register for Breast Cancer across four regions in southern Sweden. Associations between demographic, clinical, pathological variables, year of diagnosis, and OS were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. The median age at diagnosis was 57 years (interquartile range 47 – 65). On multivariable analysis, age > 75 years (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] = 2.61, P < 0.001), advanced tumor stage (T4 vs. T1; AHR = 4.30, P < 0.001), node-positive disease (AHR = 1.94, P < 0.001), and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC vs. invasive ductal carcinoma; AHR = 1.59, P = 0.024) were independently associated with worse OS. In contrast, premenopausal status (AHR = 0.52, P < 0.001), radiotherapy (AHR = 0.59, P < 0.001) and treatment with modern HER2-targeted therapies (AHR = 0.70, P = 0.032) were associated with improved OS. Stratified analyses demonstrated that ILC and year of diagnosis were prognostic only in estrogen receptor (ER)-negative disease, whereas the survival benefit of modern HER2-targeted therapy was confined to ER-positive disease. In conclusion, OS in HER2 + EBC has improved over time, reflecting advances in HER2-targeted therapies and comprehensive multimodal treatment strategies.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.