De-Westphalizing Central Asia: from Soviet biopolitics to a Silk Road mentality

This essay undertakes a project of “de-Westphalization” in the study of Central Asia, challenging the persistence of the Westphalian state model as a colonial legacy. It diagnoses this legacy by analysing the region’s Soviet-era formation through the lens of Foucauldian biopower and Hegelian teleology, arguing that these frameworks continue to shape post-Soviet concepts of sovereignty and citizenship. Adopting the methodological stance of a “wandering historian,” this essay employs an analytical trio to enact its decolonial inquiry: Michel Foucault’s critique of power provides the diagnosis, the allegorical wisdom of Khoja Nasreddin offers the counter-epistemology, and the philosophy of Ibn Sina provides the foundation for an alternative vision of the self. Contrasting the rationalist subject of Western modernity with Ibn Sina’s metaphysical self, the essay proposes a “Silk Road mentality,” a repurposed analytical framework, to recover non-territorial, ethically grounded forms of personhood beyond the confines of the nation-state.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interventions
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801x.2026.2728968
Primary Topic
Soviet and Russian History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

De-Westphalizing Central Asia: from Soviet biopolitics to a Silk Road mentality

Nargis Nurulla-Khoja
Interventions
Soviet and Russian History
article

De-Westphalizing Central Asia: from Soviet biopolitics to a Silk Road mentality

Nargis Nurulla-Khoja
article en

Abstract

This essay undertakes a project of “de-Westphalization” in the study of Central Asia, challenging the persistence of the Westphalian state model as a colonial legacy. It diagnoses this legacy by analysing the region’s Soviet-era formation through the lens of Foucauldian biopower and Hegelian teleology, arguing that these frameworks continue to shape post-Soviet concepts of sovereignty and citizenship. Adopting the methodological stance of a “wandering historian,” this essay employs an analytical trio to enact its decolonial inquiry: Michel Foucault’s critique of power provides the diagnosis, the allegorical wisdom of Khoja Nasreddin offers the counter-epistemology, and the philosophy of Ibn Sina provides the foundation for an alternative vision of the self. Contrasting the rationalist subject of Western modernity with Ibn Sina’s metaphysical self, the essay proposes a “Silk Road mentality,” a repurposed analytical framework, to recover non-territorial, ethically grounded forms of personhood beyond the confines of the nation-state.

Interventions
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Soviet and Russian History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

De-Westphalizing Central Asia: from Soviet biopolitics to a Silk Road mentality — Nargis Nurulla-Khoja · Interventions (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS