Comparative analysis of conventional, hybrid and bio-architectural approaches using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP): implications for sustainable built environment design

Abstract Sustainability is taking the lead in shaping architectural practice in the twenty-first century due to urgent environmental concerns, the goal to enhance community welfare, and the necessity of maintaining economic stability. Conventional buildings feature static structures, reliance on non-renewable materials, and a high energy consumption mode, thus becoming contradictory to the notions of sustainable development. In response, the integration of biotechnology, ecology, and architecture has fostered the rise of bio-architecture: an emergent design philosophy that promotes responsive, adaptive, and self-regulating systems. The present research aims to develop a comparative framework for conventional, hybrid, and bio-architecture approaches that enables architects to assess and compare the sustainability dimensions of each approach within a clearly defined expert-based AHP framework. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used as a decision-support tool to structure the comparison through a hierarchy of criteria and sub-criteria. The analysis therefore ranks the three alternatives within the selected criteria, expert sample, and AHP assumptions, rather than establishing a universal or context-free sustainability order. These criteria cover environmental performance, material innovation, energy efficiency, resilience and adaptability, and socio-cultural and human well-being. The proposed framework outlines the relative strengths and weaknesses of each approach and provides a systematic method for sustainable design decision-making. Within the boundaries of the selected criteria, expert sample, and AHP assumptions used in this study, bio-architecture ranked highest among the three alternatives. This result should be read as an AHP-based ranking within the adopted framework, not as an absolute claim that bio-architecture is the most sustainable alternative in all building contexts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering and Applied Science
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-026-01202-4
Primary Topic
Sustainable Design and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparative analysis of conventional, hybrid and bio-architectural approaches using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP): implications for sustainable built environment design

Enass Salama, Eman M. O. Mokhtar
Journal of Engineering and Applied Science
Sustainable Design and Development
article

Comparative analysis of conventional, hybrid and bio-architectural approaches using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP): implications for sustainable built environment design

Enass Salama, Eman M. O. Mokhtar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Sustainability is taking the lead in shaping architectural practice in the twenty-first century due to urgent environmental concerns, the goal to enhance community welfare, and the necessity of maintaining economic stability. Conventional buildings feature static structures, reliance on non-renewable materials, and a high energy consumption mode, thus becoming contradictory to the notions of sustainable development. In response, the integration of biotechnology, ecology, and architecture has fostered the rise of bio-architecture: an emergent design philosophy that promotes responsive, adaptive, and self-regulating systems. The present research aims to develop a comparative framework for conventional, hybrid, and bio-architecture approaches that enables architects to assess and compare the sustainability dimensions of each approach within a clearly defined expert-based AHP framework. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used as a decision-support tool to structure the comparison through a hierarchy of criteria and sub-criteria. The analysis therefore ranks the three alternatives within the selected criteria, expert sample, and AHP assumptions, rather than establishing a universal or context-free sustainability order. These criteria cover environmental performance, material innovation, energy efficiency, resilience and adaptability, and socio-cultural and human well-being. The proposed framework outlines the relative strengths and weaknesses of each approach and provides a systematic method for sustainable design decision-making. Within the boundaries of the selected criteria, expert sample, and AHP assumptions used in this study, bio-architecture ranked highest among the three alternatives. This result should be read as an AHP-based ranking within the adopted framework, not as an absolute claim that bio-architecture is the most sustainable alternative in all building contexts.

Journal of Engineering and Applied ScienceVol. 73(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Sustainable Design and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative analysis of conventional, hybrid and bio-architectural approaches using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP): implications for sustainable built environment design — Enass Salama, Eman M. O. Mokhtar · Journal of Engineering and Applied Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS