Effects of forest treatments on nutritional carrying capacity for white‐tailed deer in mid‐rotation loblolly pine stands

Abstract Landowners and managers are interested in improving habitat quality for white‐tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus ; hereinafter, deer) in loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda ) forests in the southeastern United States. Commercial thinning, prescribed fire, and herbicides can increase forage quality and quantity for deer at mid‐rotation, but past studies have generally been limited to stands thinned to ≥15 m 2 ha −1 or have not evaluated the effects of herbicide mixtures on forage availability for deer. We evaluated the effects of thinning, prescribed fire, and herbicide use on forage biomass (kg/ha) and nutritional carrying capacity (NCC) for deer in 5 loblolly pine stands in central Georgia, USA. We divided each stand into 3 equally sized plots and randomly assigned a thinning treatment of 9, 14, or 18 m 2 ha −1 . We thinned stands in spring 2017, applied prescribed fire to half of each plot in spring 2018 and 2020, and applied herbicide (imazapyr + metsulfuron methyl) to half of each subplot in fall 2019. Our design resulted in 3 treatment combinations (fire only, herbicide only, fire + herbicide), plus a control (thinning only), within each level of thinning. We sampled and estimated forage availability and NCC in June 2020 and 2021 using fixed nutritional constraints of 6% (maintenance) and 14% (lactation) crude protein (CP). Nutritional carrying capacity was greatest in the low basal‐area treatment but did not differ between the medium and high basal‐area treatments. Herbicide and fire, applied separately or together, reduced NCC by 52–97% under 6% CP requirements. In contrast, NCC at 14% CP was ~160% greater in the fire and fire + herbicide treatments compared to the control by the 2nd growing season post‐treatment. On average, across years, NCC at 6 and 14% CP constraints was greatest in untreated controls. However, NCC declined from 2020 to 2021 in untreated controls, likely due to additional height growth and maturation of woody plants, suggesting repeated disturbance is required to maintain NCC at high levels by promoting the optimal mix of woody plants and forbs while maintaining forage within reach. In our study, prescribed fire was the least costly treatment for accomplishing the objective of maintaining high NCC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.70048
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Effects of forest treatments on nutritional carrying capacity for white‐tailed deer in mid‐rotation loblolly pine stands

William D. Gulsby, William B. Lewis, James G. Martin, Dylan Stewart et al.
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Effects of forest treatments on nutritional carrying capacity for white‐tailed deer in mid‐rotation loblolly pine stands

William D. Gulsby, William B. Lewis, James G. Martin, Dylan Stewart, Stephen S. Ditchkoff, Daniel U. Greene, Kristina L. Johannsen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Landowners and managers are interested in improving habitat quality for white‐tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus ; hereinafter, deer) in loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda ) forests in the southeastern United States. Commercial thinning, prescribed fire, and herbicides can increase forage quality and quantity for deer at mid‐rotation, but past studies have generally been limited to stands thinned to ≥15 m 2 ha −1 or have not evaluated the effects of herbicide mixtures on forage availability for deer. We evaluated the effects of thinning, prescribed fire, and herbicide use on forage biomass (kg/ha) and nutritional carrying capacity (NCC) for deer in 5 loblolly pine stands in central Georgia, USA. We divided each stand into 3 equally sized plots and randomly assigned a thinning treatment of 9, 14, or 18 m 2 ha −1 . We thinned stands in spring 2017, applied prescribed fire to half of each plot in spring 2018 and 2020, and applied herbicide (imazapyr + metsulfuron methyl) to half of each subplot in fall 2019. Our design resulted in 3 treatment combinations (fire only, herbicide only, fire + herbicide), plus a control (thinning only), within each level of thinning. We sampled and estimated forage availability and NCC in June 2020 and 2021 using fixed nutritional constraints of 6% (maintenance) and 14% (lactation) crude protein (CP). Nutritional carrying capacity was greatest in the low basal‐area treatment but did not differ between the medium and high basal‐area treatments. Herbicide and fire, applied separately or together, reduced NCC by 52–97% under 6% CP requirements. In contrast, NCC at 14% CP was ~160% greater in the fire and fire + herbicide treatments compared to the control by the 2nd growing season post‐treatment. On average, across years, NCC at 6 and 14% CP constraints was greatest in untreated controls. However, NCC declined from 2020 to 2021 in untreated controls, likely due to additional height growth and maturation of woody plants, suggesting repeated disturbance is required to maintain NCC at high levels by promoting the optimal mix of woody plants and forbs while maintaining forage within reach. In our study, prescribed fire was the least costly treatment for accomplishing the objective of maintaining high NCC.

Wildlife Society Bulletin
Georgia Department of Natural Resources (US), University of Georgia (US), Weyerhaeuser (United States) (US), Auburn University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.