AI-Driven precision targeted therapy for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: From therapeutic evolution and resistance mechanisms to intelligent decision systems

Objective To critically review the current pharmacologic treatment landscape for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), focusing on clinical pharmacology, therapeutic evolution, and emerging challenges of EGFR-targeted therapies. Data Sources Peer-reviewed literature in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases (January 2000 to June 2026) was searched using keywords including “EGFR-mutant NSCLC,” “EGFR-TKIs,” “drug resistance,” “artificial intelligence,” and “precision oncology.” Reference lists and clinical trial registries were also screened. Data Summary This review systematically examines clinical misconceptions surrounding EGFR-targeted therapies, focusing on three cognitive biases that undermine precision implementation: overgeneralization of trial efficacy to unselected populations; oversimplified sequencing that ignores clonal selection trade-offs (second-generation TKIs reduce subsequent osimertinib Progression-free survival (PFS) by ∼2 months); and inflated efficacy perceptions for Ex20ins inhibitors (aggregate objective response rate (ORR) masks far-loop responses of only 22%) and MET combinations (true benefit confined to high-expression subgroup). We also critically evaluate artificial intelligence's translational potential in molecular subtyping, resistance prediction, and drug discovery, alongside the data, modeling, and validation barriers limiting its clinical deployment. Conclusions Despite the expanding therapeutic armamentarium, clinically meaningful precision remains constrained by persistent misconceptions and translational bottlenecks. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers enabling potential, but its integration requires standardized data infrastructures, dynamic modeling, and prospective validation. AI outputs should currently be interpreted as hypothesis-generating tools, not replacements for clinical judgment. Continued collaborative efforts are warranted to refine treatment sequencing and translate emerging technologies into measurable patient benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552261488860
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

AI-Driven precision targeted therapy for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: From therapeutic evolution and resistance mechanisms to intelligent decision systems

Hongqian Jiang, Fusheng Chi, Yan Chen, Zhen Wang et al.
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

AI-Driven precision targeted therapy for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: From therapeutic evolution and resistance mechanisms to intelligent decision systems

Hongqian Jiang, Fusheng Chi, Yan Chen, Zhen Wang, Wei Liu, Zhe Zhang, Fuxiang Wang
article en

Abstract

Objective To critically review the current pharmacologic treatment landscape for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), focusing on clinical pharmacology, therapeutic evolution, and emerging challenges of EGFR-targeted therapies. Data Sources Peer-reviewed literature in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases (January 2000 to June 2026) was searched using keywords including “EGFR-mutant NSCLC,” “EGFR-TKIs,” “drug resistance,” “artificial intelligence,” and “precision oncology.” Reference lists and clinical trial registries were also screened. Data Summary This review systematically examines clinical misconceptions surrounding EGFR-targeted therapies, focusing on three cognitive biases that undermine precision implementation: overgeneralization of trial efficacy to unselected populations; oversimplified sequencing that ignores clonal selection trade-offs (second-generation TKIs reduce subsequent osimertinib Progression-free survival (PFS) by ∼2 months); and inflated efficacy perceptions for Ex20ins inhibitors (aggregate objective response rate (ORR) masks far-loop responses of only 22%) and MET combinations (true benefit confined to high-expression subgroup). We also critically evaluate artificial intelligence's translational potential in molecular subtyping, resistance prediction, and drug discovery, alongside the data, modeling, and validation barriers limiting its clinical deployment. Conclusions Despite the expanding therapeutic armamentarium, clinically meaningful precision remains constrained by persistent misconceptions and translational bottlenecks. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers enabling potential, but its integration requires standardized data infrastructures, dynamic modeling, and prospective validation. AI outputs should currently be interpreted as hypothesis-generating tools, not replacements for clinical judgment. Continued collaborative efforts are warranted to refine treatment sequencing and translate emerging technologies into measurable patient benefit.

Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Liaoning Provincial People's Hospital (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.