Stablecoins and the Upcoming Battle for Depositors

ABSTRACT We lay out the research questions raised by the GENIUS Act of 2025 which creates a federal framework in the United States for payment stablecoins that may compete for balances with bank deposits. We first set out the motivating facts: what stablecoins are used for, what the Act does and leaves open, why a bank deposit is one leg of a bundle rather than a standalone product, and what happened when a previous innovation, namely money market funds, competed for deposits. These facts pose three policy questions relating to payment stablecoins and their issuers— payment of interest or rewards; access to Federal Reserve settlement systems; and obtaining national trust bank charters— and two analytical questions— which depositors might withdraw funds from bank to buy stablecoins and with what welfare consequences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial Review
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.70088
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Stablecoins and the Upcoming Battle for Depositors

Viral V. Acharya, Peter Koudijs, Bruce Tuckman
Financial Review
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

Stablecoins and the Upcoming Battle for Depositors

Viral V. Acharya, Peter Koudijs, Bruce Tuckman
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We lay out the research questions raised by the GENIUS Act of 2025 which creates a federal framework in the United States for payment stablecoins that may compete for balances with bank deposits. We first set out the motivating facts: what stablecoins are used for, what the Act does and leaves open, why a bank deposit is one leg of a bundle rather than a standalone product, and what happened when a previous innovation, namely money market funds, competed for deposits. These facts pose three policy questions relating to payment stablecoins and their issuers— payment of interest or rewards; access to Federal Reserve settlement systems; and obtaining national trust bank charters— and two analytical questions— which depositors might withdraw funds from bank to buy stablecoins and with what welfare consequences.

Financial Review
Center for Economic and Policy Research (US), New York University (US), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stablecoins and the Upcoming Battle for Depositors — Viral V. Acharya, Peter Koudijs, et al. · Financial Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS