Empirical Evidence on Platform Passenger Distribution and Dwell-Time Impacts in Urban Rail Networks

This study empirically examines the spatial distribution of passengers on urban rail platforms and its impact on boarding and alighting. It combines two complementary datasets from Vienna: (i) automated passenger counts, which record approximately 4.4 million boarding and alighting movements at 20 stations on the Vienna metro network over the course of one month, and (ii) detailed visual observations at 10 S-Bahn stations, covering approximately 15,000 positions of waiting passengers. The results show that passengers are not distributed evenly along the platform. Regular passengers, in particular, choose which door to use when boarding, based on the shortest expected route when alighting. Instead, stable local clusters form at individual doors, where up to 3.5 times the theoretical average passenger share can be observed. It is noted that this uneven distribution decreases during periods of high occupancy and increases during periods of low occupancy. These distributions prolong dwell time, reduce timetable robustness and refute the widespread assumption of uniform passenger distribution in planning and simulation. This work establishes an empirical basis for door-specific modelling of stopping times, the targeted placement of platform access points and information-based demand management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Science
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci10100543
Primary Topic
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Empirical Evidence on Platform Passenger Distribution and Dwell-Time Impacts in Urban Rail Networks

Bernhard Rüger, Thomas Eigner, Niklas Schnitzer, Marko Delac
Urban Science
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
article

Empirical Evidence on Platform Passenger Distribution and Dwell-Time Impacts in Urban Rail Networks

Bernhard Rüger, Thomas Eigner, Niklas Schnitzer, Marko Delac
article en

Abstract

This study empirically examines the spatial distribution of passengers on urban rail platforms and its impact on boarding and alighting. It combines two complementary datasets from Vienna: (i) automated passenger counts, which record approximately 4.4 million boarding and alighting movements at 20 stations on the Vienna metro network over the course of one month, and (ii) detailed visual observations at 10 S-Bahn stations, covering approximately 15,000 positions of waiting passengers. The results show that passengers are not distributed evenly along the platform. Regular passengers, in particular, choose which door to use when boarding, based on the shortest expected route when alighting. Instead, stable local clusters form at individual doors, where up to 3.5 times the theoretical average passenger share can be observed. It is noted that this uneven distribution decreases during periods of high occupancy and increases during periods of low occupancy. These distributions prolong dwell time, reduce timetable robustness and refute the widespread assumption of uniform passenger distribution in planning and simulation. This work establishes an empirical basis for door-specific modelling of stopping times, the targeted placement of platform access points and information-based demand management.

Urban ScienceVol. 10(10)
University of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien (AT), TU Wien (AT), University of Applied Sciences St Pölten (AT)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.