A qualitative exploration of information access and provision for cancer survivors experiencing chronic bowel symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy: informing a framework to guide improvements to information provision

Abstract Purpose For people living with and beyond cancer, access to clear, accurate, relevant information is crucial for meaningful participation in shared decision-making and is associated with better quality-of-life. Many cancer patients who undergo pelvic radiation experience chronic bowel symptoms, decreasing quality-of-life. We aimed to explore information access among survivors with experience of chronic bowel symptoms and develop a framework to guide future information provision. Methods We conducted cross-sectional, semi-structured interviews with 28 cancer survivors (14 prostate, 10 gynecological, 4 anal/rectal) with experience of chronic bowel symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy, and 19 health professionals who provide treatment and care for survivors with these symptoms. Participants were recruited through UK cancer charities and National Health Service hospitals. Data were analyzed thematically. Findings informed a framework to guide improvements to information provision, developed with a patient panel. Results Data were organized to reflect survivor experiences with information access and provision at different points along their cancer journey: Pre-treatment; Recognizing Symptoms; Managing S ymptoms; and two cross-cutting categories of Information Sources and Challenges in Information Provision. The framework encompasses information purpose and channels, survivors’ information needs at different time points and challenges and considerations for implementation. Conclusion Access to timely, relevant, accurate information was an issue across the cancer pathway for this survivor group. Participants reported disparate information needs which could not have been fully known at treatment outset, and which changed over time. Our framework offers a potential starting point for efforts to improve information access and provision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-11040-y
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A qualitative exploration of information access and provision for cancer survivors experiencing chronic bowel symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy: informing a framework to guide improvements to information provision

Colin John Rees, Laura Jane Neilson, Adam Biran, Lisa Durrant et al.
Supportive Care in Cancer
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

A qualitative exploration of information access and provision for cancer survivors experiencing chronic bowel symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy: informing a framework to guide improvements to information provision

Colin John Rees, Laura Jane Neilson, Adam Biran, Lisa Durrant, Christina Dobson, R. Pearson, Linda A. Sharp, Anthony Cunliffe, John Hancock, Ana Wilson, Jack Maybury
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose For people living with and beyond cancer, access to clear, accurate, relevant information is crucial for meaningful participation in shared decision-making and is associated with better quality-of-life. Many cancer patients who undergo pelvic radiation experience chronic bowel symptoms, decreasing quality-of-life. We aimed to explore information access among survivors with experience of chronic bowel symptoms and develop a framework to guide future information provision. Methods We conducted cross-sectional, semi-structured interviews with 28 cancer survivors (14 prostate, 10 gynecological, 4 anal/rectal) with experience of chronic bowel symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy, and 19 health professionals who provide treatment and care for survivors with these symptoms. Participants were recruited through UK cancer charities and National Health Service hospitals. Data were analyzed thematically. Findings informed a framework to guide improvements to information provision, developed with a patient panel. Results Data were organized to reflect survivor experiences with information access and provision at different points along their cancer journey: Pre-treatment; Recognizing Symptoms; Managing S ymptoms; and two cross-cutting categories of Information Sources and Challenges in Information Provision. The framework encompasses information purpose and channels, survivors’ information needs at different time points and challenges and considerations for implementation. Conclusion Access to timely, relevant, accurate information was an issue across the cancer pathway for this survivor group. Participants reported disparate information needs which could not have been fully known at treatment outset, and which changed over time. Our framework offers a potential starting point for efforts to improve information access and provision.

Supportive Care in CancerVol. 34(10)
North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Exeter (GB), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), London Cancer (GB), Taunton & Somerset NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital (GB), NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre (GB), South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Northern Powergrid (United Kingdom) (GB), St Mark's Hospital (GB), Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Imperial College London (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.