Adding‐On Wisely: Hematopathology Reflective Testing in Canada

ABSTRACT Introduction Reflective testing describes laboratory clinicians' discretionary addition of testing on existing samples, after initial result review. This practice has proven valuable in clinical biochemistry but faces controversy regarding consent and costs. No prior research exists regarding reflective testing in Canadian hematopathology. We surveyed hematopathologists across Canada to characterize current practices and perspectives. Methods A REDCap survey was distributed to 89 licensed hematopathologists across all provinces (excluding Quebec), capturing demographics, institutional guidelines, and reflective testing practices, as well as ethical and medicolegal perspectives. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed on all responses. Results Thirty‐three eligible survey responses were received. Reflective testing was ordered at least once weekly by 63% of hematopathologists, yet only 30% had institutional guidance. Ethical perspectives varied: 27% felt that consenting to initial testing implies consent for reflective testing, while 61% indicated this depends on the type of test added. Routine prior notification of the initial ordering clinician (IOC) and/or patient was reported by only 24%. Overall, 79% supported the use of reflective testing, citing improved diagnostic timeliness, reduced phlebotomy, and patient management. None opposed the use of reflective testing, although 21% had encountered a complaint or legal concern related to the practice. Conclusion Reflective testing is widely used and supported among Canadian hematopathologists as a value‐added practice leveraging clinical expertise to improve patient care. Implementation varies, with diverse institutional guidance and perspectives on implied consent, communication, and medicolegal responsibility. Our findings identify an opportunity for national consensus building to support transparent, ethically grounded, and patient‐centered reflective testing practices in hematopathology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.70248
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Adding‐On Wisely: Hematopathology Reflective Testing in Canada

Eileen R. McBride, Eric McEvoy
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Adding‐On Wisely: Hematopathology Reflective Testing in Canada

Eileen R. McBride, Eric McEvoy
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Reflective testing describes laboratory clinicians' discretionary addition of testing on existing samples, after initial result review. This practice has proven valuable in clinical biochemistry but faces controversy regarding consent and costs. No prior research exists regarding reflective testing in Canadian hematopathology. We surveyed hematopathologists across Canada to characterize current practices and perspectives. Methods A REDCap survey was distributed to 89 licensed hematopathologists across all provinces (excluding Quebec), capturing demographics, institutional guidelines, and reflective testing practices, as well as ethical and medicolegal perspectives. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed on all responses. Results Thirty‐three eligible survey responses were received. Reflective testing was ordered at least once weekly by 63% of hematopathologists, yet only 30% had institutional guidance. Ethical perspectives varied: 27% felt that consenting to initial testing implies consent for reflective testing, while 61% indicated this depends on the type of test added. Routine prior notification of the initial ordering clinician (IOC) and/or patient was reported by only 24%. Overall, 79% supported the use of reflective testing, citing improved diagnostic timeliness, reduced phlebotomy, and patient management. None opposed the use of reflective testing, although 21% had encountered a complaint or legal concern related to the practice. Conclusion Reflective testing is widely used and supported among Canadian hematopathologists as a value‐added practice leveraging clinical expertise to improve patient care. Implementation varies, with diverse institutional guidance and perspectives on implied consent, communication, and medicolegal responsibility. Our findings identify an opportunity for national consensus building to support transparent, ethically grounded, and patient‐centered reflective testing practices in hematopathology.

International Journal of Laboratory Hematology
University of Ottawa (CA), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CA), Canadian Electricity Association (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.