Climate responsibility as a new ‘standard of civilization’ in international society? The case of the Arctic region in 2035

This article combines the English School theory of International Relations with the Futures Studies methodology to explore alternative ways in which climate responsibility could emerge as a new ‘standard of civilization’ in international society by 2035. It seeks to spur outside-the-box thinking about what the ‘content’ of climate responsibility could or should look like in the future. Drawing on insights from expert interviews and an online stakeholder panel, it produces three scenarios located in the Arctic. The scenarios are: (1) ‘Greed for climate business: A green transition with winners and losers’; (2) ‘Tackling climate insecurity: A green transition that enhances human well-being’; and (3) ‘Hope for planetary well-being: A green transition of multispecies harmony’. They address key normative and structural changes required for climate-responsible international societies. Ultimately, the article demonstrates that, against the odds, the English School is ideal for exploring future trajectories in international relations, especially when combined with the creative methods of Futures Studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Globalizations
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2026.2727748
Primary Topic
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Climate responsibility as a new ‘standard of civilization’ in international society? The case of the Arctic region in 2035

Liisa Kauppila, Sanna Kopra
Globalizations
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
article

Climate responsibility as a new ‘standard of civilization’ in international society? The case of the Arctic region in 2035

Liisa Kauppila, Sanna Kopra
article en

Abstract

This article combines the English School theory of International Relations with the Futures Studies methodology to explore alternative ways in which climate responsibility could emerge as a new ‘standard of civilization’ in international society by 2035. It seeks to spur outside-the-box thinking about what the ‘content’ of climate responsibility could or should look like in the future. Drawing on insights from expert interviews and an online stakeholder panel, it produces three scenarios located in the Arctic. The scenarios are: (1) ‘Greed for climate business: A green transition with winners and losers’; (2) ‘Tackling climate insecurity: A green transition that enhances human well-being’; and (3) ‘Hope for planetary well-being: A green transition of multispecies harmony’. They address key normative and structural changes required for climate-responsible international societies. Ultimately, the article demonstrates that, against the odds, the English School is ideal for exploring future trajectories in international relations, especially when combined with the creative methods of Futures Studies.

Globalizations
University of Lapland (FI)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.