On Autonomy and Hooked Nudges for Smartphone Apps

Abstract The “Hooked” model for smartphone app design consists of nudges that aim to induce repeated, habitual application use. Rebecca Zeilstra (2026) argues that these “Hooked nudges” undermine our autonomy by preventing us from being reasons responsive. By leading us to develop a rigid intuitive response to using our smartphone apps, they make it difficult for us to react to the reasons we may have to use them less frequently. In this comment, I build on Zeilstra’s work by highlighting an additional way in which Hooked nudges may undermine our autonomy by threatening our reasons responsiveness. I argue that Hooked nudges may give us reasons for using these apps that we would not have otherwise and that we do not recognize as morally acceptable, but that we nevertheless have a difficult time resisting. I also highlight how Hooked nudges may undermine an alternative dimension of our autonomy, namely our ability to act in accordance with our values and preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-026-01194-2
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

On Autonomy and Hooked Nudges for Smartphone Apps

Stephanie Sheintul
Philosophy & Technology
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

On Autonomy and Hooked Nudges for Smartphone Apps

Stephanie Sheintul
article en

Abstract

Abstract The “Hooked” model for smartphone app design consists of nudges that aim to induce repeated, habitual application use. Rebecca Zeilstra (2026) argues that these “Hooked nudges” undermine our autonomy by preventing us from being reasons responsive. By leading us to develop a rigid intuitive response to using our smartphone apps, they make it difficult for us to react to the reasons we may have to use them less frequently. In this comment, I build on Zeilstra’s work by highlighting an additional way in which Hooked nudges may undermine our autonomy by threatening our reasons responsiveness. I argue that Hooked nudges may give us reasons for using these apps that we would not have otherwise and that we do not recognize as morally acceptable, but that we nevertheless have a difficult time resisting. I also highlight how Hooked nudges may undermine an alternative dimension of our autonomy, namely our ability to act in accordance with our values and preferences.

Philosophy & TechnologyVol. 39(4)
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.