Multiphysics, Machine Learning, and Physics Informed Approaches to Fault Reactivation During Geological CO2 Storage: A Critical Review and Research Roadmap

Geological CO2 storage must operate within pressure and stress limits that preserve caprock, fault, and well integrity while sustaining climate-relevant injection. Existing reviews often treat multiphysics simulation, machine learning, and physics-informed learning separately, which obscures the different evidence required for stability screening, first slip, aseismic deformation, dynamic rupture, monitoring analytics, and containment consequences. This structured critical review integrates direct CO2 storage observations, laboratory studies, injection analogues, multiphysics numerical methods, data-driven machine learning, and scientific machine learning within a target-specific evidence framework. We compare continuum, discontinuum, interface, and diffuse fracture formulations; one-way, staggered, and monolithic coupling; field and laboratory validation; seismic, deformation, pressure, and fiber optic monitoring; and physics-informed neural networks, neural operators, and reduced-order models. The synthesis herein identifies the strongest evidence base for pressure and deformation modeling and seismic signal processing, for which repeated field or operational applications and task-specific evaluation are available. By contrast, prospective fault slip and seismicity forecasting remain at a limited evidence level because of uncertain in situ stress, fault connectivity, CO2-conditioned friction, monitoring detection limits, model discrepancy, and scarce cross-site validation. We propose task-appropriate metrics, explicit method maturity criteria, a validation ladder, and a staged, human-supervised digital twin roadmap. Machine learning and physics-informed methods are most credible as bounded complements to verified simulators and monitoring systems, and operational readiness should be judged by uncertainty-calibrated prospective evidence rather than algorithm novelty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/acn1010001
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Multiphysics, Machine Learning, and Physics Informed Approaches to Fault Reactivation During Geological CO2 Storage: A Critical Review and Research Roadmap

Kwamena Opoku Duartey, Hamid Rahnema, Kelvin Hayford, William Apau Marfo et al.
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
article

Multiphysics, Machine Learning, and Physics Informed Approaches to Fault Reactivation During Geological CO2 Storage: A Critical Review and Research Roadmap

Kwamena Opoku Duartey, Hamid Rahnema, Kelvin Hayford, William Apau Marfo, Osei-Nsankyire Joseph, Godsway Akpabli
article en

Abstract

Geological CO2 storage must operate within pressure and stress limits that preserve caprock, fault, and well integrity while sustaining climate-relevant injection. Existing reviews often treat multiphysics simulation, machine learning, and physics-informed learning separately, which obscures the different evidence required for stability screening, first slip, aseismic deformation, dynamic rupture, monitoring analytics, and containment consequences. This structured critical review integrates direct CO2 storage observations, laboratory studies, injection analogues, multiphysics numerical methods, data-driven machine learning, and scientific machine learning within a target-specific evidence framework. We compare continuum, discontinuum, interface, and diffuse fracture formulations; one-way, staggered, and monolithic coupling; field and laboratory validation; seismic, deformation, pressure, and fiber optic monitoring; and physics-informed neural networks, neural operators, and reduced-order models. The synthesis herein identifies the strongest evidence base for pressure and deformation modeling and seismic signal processing, for which repeated field or operational applications and task-specific evaluation are available. By contrast, prospective fault slip and seismicity forecasting remain at a limited evidence level because of uncertain in situ stress, fault connectivity, CO2-conditioned friction, monitoring detection limits, model discrepancy, and scarce cross-site validation. We propose task-appropriate metrics, explicit method maturity criteria, a validation ladder, and a staged, human-supervised digital twin roadmap. Machine learning and physics-informed methods are most credible as bounded complements to verified simulators and monitoring systems, and operational readiness should be judged by uncertainty-calibrated prospective evidence rather than algorithm novelty.

Vol. 1(1)
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.