Quantitative evaluation of synthetic MRI for assessing disease activity in thyroid eye disease

Abstract Objective Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for thyroid eye disease (TED) is limited by long scan time, restricting quantitative assessment. Synthetic MRI techniques, such as magnetic resonance image compilation (MAGiC), allow for the simultaneous acquisition of T1, T2, and proton density (PD) maps in a single, rapid scan. This study evaluated MAGiC MRI as a quantitative imaging approach for TED disease activity assessment. Materials and methods A total of 113 TED patients (49 active, 64 inactive) underwent orbital MRI using a 3-T scanner with MAGiC sequences. Quantitative T1, T2, and PD maps were analyzed for correlations with the clinical activity score (CAS). Image quality of MAGiC_STIR and IDEAL IQ_WP sequences was assessed by two radiologists. Reproducibility was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to identify independent predictors and evaluate diagnostic performance. Results CAS showed significant correlations with multiple MAGiC parameters, especially MR_T1 and MR_PD ( p = 0.018, 0.040, respectively). MAGiC_STIR achieved comparable image quality to IDEAL IQ_WP (64.6% versus 67.3%). Quantitative parameters demonstrated excellent reproducibility (ICC = 0.755–0.985). IR_T1, SR_T1, and IR_PD independently predicted TED activity. The combined T1 + PD model achieved the highest accuracy (area under the ROC curve = 0.898; sensitivity = 0.816; specificity = 0.875), and adding T2 did not result in a significant improvement ( p = 1.000), as assessed by the DeLong test. Conclusion Synthetic MAGiC MRI provides fast and reproducible quantitative assessment of TED activity. The T1 + PD model offers an efficient, objective biomarker for disease staging and treatment planning. Key Points Question Can synthetic MRI provide rapid, reproducible quantitative biomarkers for accurately differentiating active and inactive TED within a single acquisition? Findings Synthetic MRI independently predicted disease activity, and the combined model achieved excellent diagnostic performance. Relevance Statement This study demonstrates that synthetic MRI can effectively assess the disease activity of TED, providing reproducible quantitative biomarkers to enhance disease staging and assist treatment decisions more efficiently.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Radiology Experimental
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-026-00807-x
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Quantitative evaluation of synthetic MRI for assessing disease activity in thyroid eye disease

Sien Ping Chew, Mengda Jiang, Duojin Xia, Yong Zhang et al.
European Radiology Experimental
Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
article

Quantitative evaluation of synthetic MRI for assessing disease activity in thyroid eye disease

Sien Ping Chew, Mengda Jiang, Duojin Xia, Yong Zhang, H. Zhou, Xiaofeng Tao, Hui Wang, Ling Zhu, Haiyang Zhang, Yinwei Li, Jing Sun
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for thyroid eye disease (TED) is limited by long scan time, restricting quantitative assessment. Synthetic MRI techniques, such as magnetic resonance image compilation (MAGiC), allow for the simultaneous acquisition of T1, T2, and proton density (PD) maps in a single, rapid scan. This study evaluated MAGiC MRI as a quantitative imaging approach for TED disease activity assessment. Materials and methods A total of 113 TED patients (49 active, 64 inactive) underwent orbital MRI using a 3-T scanner with MAGiC sequences. Quantitative T1, T2, and PD maps were analyzed for correlations with the clinical activity score (CAS). Image quality of MAGiC_STIR and IDEAL IQ_WP sequences was assessed by two radiologists. Reproducibility was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to identify independent predictors and evaluate diagnostic performance. Results CAS showed significant correlations with multiple MAGiC parameters, especially MR_T1 and MR_PD ( p = 0.018, 0.040, respectively). MAGiC_STIR achieved comparable image quality to IDEAL IQ_WP (64.6% versus 67.3%). Quantitative parameters demonstrated excellent reproducibility (ICC = 0.755–0.985). IR_T1, SR_T1, and IR_PD independently predicted TED activity. The combined T1 + PD model achieved the highest accuracy (area under the ROC curve = 0.898; sensitivity = 0.816; specificity = 0.875), and adding T2 did not result in a significant improvement ( p = 1.000), as assessed by the DeLong test. Conclusion Synthetic MAGiC MRI provides fast and reproducible quantitative assessment of TED activity. The T1 + PD model offers an efficient, objective biomarker for disease staging and treatment planning. Key Points Question Can synthetic MRI provide rapid, reproducible quantitative biomarkers for accurately differentiating active and inactive TED within a single acquisition? Findings Synthetic MRI independently predicted disease activity, and the combined model achieved excellent diagnostic performance. Relevance Statement This study demonstrates that synthetic MRI can effectively assess the disease activity of TED, providing reproducible quantitative biomarkers to enhance disease staging and assist treatment decisions more efficiently.

European Radiology ExperimentalVol. 10(1)
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital (CN), United Imaging Healthcare (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.