Occurrence, Fate, and Ecotoxicological Effects of Steroid Hormones in Aquatic Environments

Steroid hormones constitute a group of emerging contaminants with high biological activity; their presence in aquatic systems is primarily linked to municipal wastewater, animal production, aquaculture, and pharmaceutical use. Their environmental significance lies in the fact that they can induce biological responses at very low concentrations, even within ranges considered environmentally low. This review synthesizes and analyzes the available evidence on the presence, environmental distribution, treatment, fate, and ecotoxicological effects of natural and synthetic steroid hormones in different aquatic matrices. The compiled results show wide variability in environmental concentrations, with estrone (E1) values of up to 3050 ng L−1 in effluents from wastewater treatment plants, 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) of 4608 ng L−1 in effluents, and progesterone of up to 16,687 ng L−1 in treated effluents. In surface waters, concentrations of up to 4152 ng L−1 for E1 and 1200 ng L−1 for EE2 were recorded. From an ecotoxicological perspective, reproductive, developmental, molecular, metabolic, and physiological alterations were documented at exposure concentrations as low as 0.4 ng L−1 for EE2 and 0.5 ng L−1 for levonorgestrel (LNG). However, the concentration associated with each response varied widely depending on the species, the compound, the developmental stage, the duration of exposure, and the experimental conditions. The available evidence indicates that conventional wastewater treatment may not completely remove these compounds, thereby facilitating their transfer to receiving ecosystems, while sediments may act as potential environmental reservoirs. Taken together, the findings highlight the need to assess steroid hormones using an integrated approach that simultaneously considers concentration, exposure, biological response, environmental persistence, and the specific characteristics of each compound, particularly in studies aimed at evaluating their ecological relevance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2026-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w18182345
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Occurrence, Fate, and Ecotoxicological Effects of Steroid Hormones in Aquatic Environments

María José Mesa, Giovanna Reyes Almeida, Miriam Hampel, Hernando José Bolívar-Anillo et al.
Water
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
article

Occurrence, Fate, and Ecotoxicological Effects of Steroid Hormones in Aquatic Environments

María José Mesa, Giovanna Reyes Almeida, Miriam Hampel, Hernando José Bolívar-Anillo, Giorgio Anfuso, Dayana Michel Castro Vivanco, Ronield Fernández, Camilo Gutiérrez
article en

Abstract

Steroid hormones constitute a group of emerging contaminants with high biological activity; their presence in aquatic systems is primarily linked to municipal wastewater, animal production, aquaculture, and pharmaceutical use. Their environmental significance lies in the fact that they can induce biological responses at very low concentrations, even within ranges considered environmentally low. This review synthesizes and analyzes the available evidence on the presence, environmental distribution, treatment, fate, and ecotoxicological effects of natural and synthetic steroid hormones in different aquatic matrices. The compiled results show wide variability in environmental concentrations, with estrone (E1) values of up to 3050 ng L−1 in effluents from wastewater treatment plants, 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) of 4608 ng L−1 in effluents, and progesterone of up to 16,687 ng L−1 in treated effluents. In surface waters, concentrations of up to 4152 ng L−1 for E1 and 1200 ng L−1 for EE2 were recorded. From an ecotoxicological perspective, reproductive, developmental, molecular, metabolic, and physiological alterations were documented at exposure concentrations as low as 0.4 ng L−1 for EE2 and 0.5 ng L−1 for levonorgestrel (LNG). However, the concentration associated with each response varied widely depending on the species, the compound, the developmental stage, the duration of exposure, and the experimental conditions. The available evidence indicates that conventional wastewater treatment may not completely remove these compounds, thereby facilitating their transfer to receiving ecosystems, while sediments may act as potential environmental reservoirs. Taken together, the findings highlight the need to assess steroid hormones using an integrated approach that simultaneously considers concentration, exposure, biological response, environmental persistence, and the specific characteristics of each compound, particularly in studies aimed at evaluating their ecological relevance.

WaterVol. 18(18)
Universidad de Cádiz (ES), Universidad Simón Bolívar (CO), Instituto de Ciencias Marinas de Andalucía (ES)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.