Uncovering selection bias due to enrollment in Medicare claims studies

Abstract Research using administrative claims data often excludes individuals with secondary payors or incomplete coverage. We aimed to determine whether doing so leads to selection bias in longitudinal studies of the Medicare population. Using nationally representative data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), we summarized Medicare enrollment trends from 2011-2019 and measured the association between self-reported sleep medication use and two outcomes: falls and dementia. There were 8,244 Medicare beneficiaries in the NHATS 2011 cohort, and the prevalence of Part C enrollment increased from 29% in 2011 to 42% in 2019. Among those without Part C, the percentage with complete (12 months) Part A, B, and D coverage increased from 45% in 2011 to 60% in 2019. To assess potential coverage-related selection bias, we repeated discrete-time survey-weighted survival analyses after restricting the cohort by common Medicare enrollment criteria (e.g., excluding Part C enrollees). Unadjusted and adjusted associations between sleep medication use and incident dementia or falls were broadly similar across Medicare-defined subsamples and the full cohort. Sleep medication use was not associated with dementia but was positively associated with falls. Sensitivity analyses requiring continuous eligibility showed consistent results. Enrollment in non-traditional Medicare has increased, but in these examples did not lead to significant selection bias.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AJE Advances Research in Epidemiology
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajeadv/uuag038
Primary Topic
Medication Adherence and Compliance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Uncovering selection bias due to enrollment in Medicare claims studies

Dawei Xie, Ali G. Hamedani, Zhijie Duan, Allison Wright Willis
AJE Advances Research in Epidemiology
Medication Adherence and Compliance
article

Uncovering selection bias due to enrollment in Medicare claims studies

Dawei Xie, Ali G. Hamedani, Zhijie Duan, Allison Wright Willis
article en

Abstract

Abstract Research using administrative claims data often excludes individuals with secondary payors or incomplete coverage. We aimed to determine whether doing so leads to selection bias in longitudinal studies of the Medicare population. Using nationally representative data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), we summarized Medicare enrollment trends from 2011-2019 and measured the association between self-reported sleep medication use and two outcomes: falls and dementia. There were 8,244 Medicare beneficiaries in the NHATS 2011 cohort, and the prevalence of Part C enrollment increased from 29% in 2011 to 42% in 2019. Among those without Part C, the percentage with complete (12 months) Part A, B, and D coverage increased from 45% in 2011 to 60% in 2019. To assess potential coverage-related selection bias, we repeated discrete-time survey-weighted survival analyses after restricting the cohort by common Medicare enrollment criteria (e.g., excluding Part C enrollees). Unadjusted and adjusted associations between sleep medication use and incident dementia or falls were broadly similar across Medicare-defined subsamples and the full cohort. Sleep medication use was not associated with dementia but was positively associated with falls. Sensitivity analyses requiring continuous eligibility showed consistent results. Enrollment in non-traditional Medicare has increased, but in these examples did not lead to significant selection bias.

AJE Advances Research in Epidemiology
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Medication Adherence and Compliance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.