Enhancing Far-Forward Resuscitation: A Quantitative Laboratory Analysis of Blood Warmer Devices Used in Austere Environments

OBJECTIVES It is well known that hypothermia increases organ dysfunction and mortality in traumatically injured patients. While several small, portable blood warmers are commercially available, comparative data on their warming efficiency and flow dynamics remain limited. Thus, the objective of this study was to identify optimal blood warming devices for far-forward austere trauma resuscitation.METHODS This prospective experimental study assessed six blood warming devices: QinFlow Warrior Lite™, MWarmer™, Buddy Lite™, Thermal Angel®, the LifeWarmer Quantum™, and the Ready Heat Blanket™, using whole blood stored at 4 °C. Devices were tested in triplicate under two pressure conditions (0 and 300 mmHg). Flow was measured volumetrically and converted into average (Qavg), ideal (Qi), and maximum (Qmax) flow rates. Temperature was measured at the distal end of intravenous tubing and analyzed using average (Tavg), ideal (Ti), and maximum (Tmax) definitions. Time-to-one-unit (TT1U) was calculated as a clinically meaningful metric. Two-way ANOVA with interaction terms and post hoc Tukey testing were used for statistical comparison, with significance defined as multiplicity-adjusted p < 0.05.RESULTS The Quantum exhibited the highest Qi at both pressure levels, achieving a TT1U of 1.55 ± 0.10 minutes at 300 mmHg, significantly faster than all other devices. However, its warming performance declined significantly with increased pressure, with Ti decreasing from 34.7 °C to 25.6 °C (p < 0.0001). In contrast, the MWarmer demonstrated the highest and most consistent warming performance across all pressure conditions, maintaining Ti of 40–41 °C (p < 0.0001) at both pressure conditions. The Buddy Lite showed poor warming performance with pressure-related degradation, while Ready Heat provided negligible warming capacity with flow comparable to control.CONCLUSIONS This is an independent quantitative comparison of portable blood warming devices using cold-stored whole blood under clinically relevant pressure conditions. Results suggest that the MWarmer offers the most favorable balance of thermal performance and flow for far-forward resuscitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prehospital Emergency Care
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2026.2736179
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Enhancing Far-Forward Resuscitation: A Quantitative Laboratory Analysis of Blood Warmer Devices Used in Austere Environments

C. Treager, Mariah A. Jensen-Wachspress, Matthew Monaco, Conner Murphy et al.
Prehospital Emergency Care
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Enhancing Far-Forward Resuscitation: A Quantitative Laboratory Analysis of Blood Warmer Devices Used in Austere Environments

C. Treager, Mariah A. Jensen-Wachspress, Matthew Monaco, Conner Murphy, Eric Sulava, Wayne Papalski, Fernando U. Gonzalez, Lorie Gower, Brittany Dellinger, Kay-Cee Patterson, Eric J. Koch, Matthew A. Tovar, Emily Friedrich
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES It is well known that hypothermia increases organ dysfunction and mortality in traumatically injured patients. While several small, portable blood warmers are commercially available, comparative data on their warming efficiency and flow dynamics remain limited. Thus, the objective of this study was to identify optimal blood warming devices for far-forward austere trauma resuscitation.METHODS This prospective experimental study assessed six blood warming devices: QinFlow Warrior Lite™, MWarmer™, Buddy Lite™, Thermal Angel®, the LifeWarmer Quantum™, and the Ready Heat Blanket™, using whole blood stored at 4 °C. Devices were tested in triplicate under two pressure conditions (0 and 300 mmHg). Flow was measured volumetrically and converted into average (Qavg), ideal (Qi), and maximum (Qmax) flow rates. Temperature was measured at the distal end of intravenous tubing and analyzed using average (Tavg), ideal (Ti), and maximum (Tmax) definitions. Time-to-one-unit (TT1U) was calculated as a clinically meaningful metric. Two-way ANOVA with interaction terms and post hoc Tukey testing were used for statistical comparison, with significance defined as multiplicity-adjusted p < 0.05.RESULTS The Quantum exhibited the highest Qi at both pressure levels, achieving a TT1U of 1.55 ± 0.10 minutes at 300 mmHg, significantly faster than all other devices. However, its warming performance declined significantly with increased pressure, with Ti decreasing from 34.7 °C to 25.6 °C (p < 0.0001). In contrast, the MWarmer demonstrated the highest and most consistent warming performance across all pressure conditions, maintaining Ti of 40–41 °C (p < 0.0001) at both pressure conditions. The Buddy Lite showed poor warming performance with pressure-related degradation, while Ready Heat provided negligible warming capacity with flow comparable to control.CONCLUSIONS This is an independent quantitative comparison of portable blood warming devices using cold-stored whole blood under clinically relevant pressure conditions. Results suggest that the MWarmer offers the most favorable balance of thermal performance and flow for far-forward resuscitation.

Prehospital Emergency Care
New York City Fire Department (US), Northwell Health (US), Exponent (United States) (US), Tripler Army Medical Center (US), General Dynamics (Canada) (CA), International University (KH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.