Manufactured stakeholder voice in global value chain sustainability governance: Toward a conceptual model of astroturfing

Abstract Sustainability governance in global value chains increasingly relies on stakeholder identification and engagement to determine which issues and claims are material and what should be reported, enforced, and managed across dispersed production and consumption networks. Organizations or intermediaries may manipulate these participatory processes by manufacturing apparently independent stakeholder voice, a phenomenon conceptualized in this paper as astroturfing. Existing explanations of governance shortcomings emphasize greenwashing and decoupling, leaving the composition and credibility of stakeholder voice underexamined. Drawing on an integrative review of research on astroturfing, global value chain governance, legitimacy, and stakeholder voice, the paper develops a conceptual model explaining how astroturfing may shape sustainability governance decisions through three mechanisms: (1) reweighting stakeholder voice, whereby constituency simulation alters the perceived balance of support or opposition; (2) reframing evaluation criteria, whereby manufactured voice redirects attention toward preferred proxies, metrics, or definitions of sustainability progress; and (3) recalibrating enforcement intensity, whereby apparently broad-based contestation weakens or delays governance responses. The conceptual model further proposes that the influence of these mechanisms depends on disclosure and accountability regimes, issue salience, public regulatory oversight, and the authentication of stakeholder mandates. The paper contributes to sustainability governance and global value chain scholarship by positioning constituency authenticity as a central yet undertheorized governance variable in cross-border sustainability initiatives. Practical implications are also identified for multistakeholder initiatives, auditors, buyers, and policymakers seeking to reduce governance systems’ vulnerability to manufactured stakeholder voice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management & Governance
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-026-09811-0
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Manufactured stakeholder voice in global value chain sustainability governance: Toward a conceptual model of astroturfing

Sajad Fayezi
Journal of Management & Governance
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
article

Manufactured stakeholder voice in global value chain sustainability governance: Toward a conceptual model of astroturfing

Sajad Fayezi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Sustainability governance in global value chains increasingly relies on stakeholder identification and engagement to determine which issues and claims are material and what should be reported, enforced, and managed across dispersed production and consumption networks. Organizations or intermediaries may manipulate these participatory processes by manufacturing apparently independent stakeholder voice, a phenomenon conceptualized in this paper as astroturfing. Existing explanations of governance shortcomings emphasize greenwashing and decoupling, leaving the composition and credibility of stakeholder voice underexamined. Drawing on an integrative review of research on astroturfing, global value chain governance, legitimacy, and stakeholder voice, the paper develops a conceptual model explaining how astroturfing may shape sustainability governance decisions through three mechanisms: (1) reweighting stakeholder voice, whereby constituency simulation alters the perceived balance of support or opposition; (2) reframing evaluation criteria, whereby manufactured voice redirects attention toward preferred proxies, metrics, or definitions of sustainability progress; and (3) recalibrating enforcement intensity, whereby apparently broad-based contestation weakens or delays governance responses. The conceptual model further proposes that the influence of these mechanisms depends on disclosure and accountability regimes, issue salience, public regulatory oversight, and the authentication of stakeholder mandates. The paper contributes to sustainability governance and global value chain scholarship by positioning constituency authenticity as a central yet undertheorized governance variable in cross-border sustainability initiatives. Practical implications are also identified for multistakeholder initiatives, auditors, buyers, and policymakers seeking to reduce governance systems’ vulnerability to manufactured stakeholder voice.

Journal of Management & Governance
Adelaide University (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.