WHAT ARE THE CORE FEATURES OF A GOOD GRANT APPLICATION?

Grant writing is a core part of academic work, yet we receive far less training in this than we do in how to conduct the science itself. In this lecture, I will start by helping you get into the mindset of the “lead reviewer”, that key person who will assess your application most closely and speak to it at the funding board meeting. That person can heavily sway decision-making so keeping them on side is critical. Also, helping your work shine for them will make it a more pleasant read for everyone - from your peer reviewers to other members of the board who might know very little about your methodological approach or condition of interest. Following this, I will provide both strategic and practical guidance that will help you present your ideas in their best light, and help the lead reviewer find what they need easily. I will end with a few reflections on how to find ways to prioritise time for grant-writing in your busy schedules.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2026.112930
Primary Topic
Research, Science, and Academia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

WHAT ARE THE CORE FEATURES OF A GOOD GRANT APPLICATION?

Thalia Eley
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Research, Science, and Academia
article

WHAT ARE THE CORE FEATURES OF A GOOD GRANT APPLICATION?

Thalia Eley
article en

Abstract

Grant writing is a core part of academic work, yet we receive far less training in this than we do in how to conduct the science itself. In this lecture, I will start by helping you get into the mindset of the “lead reviewer”, that key person who will assess your application most closely and speak to it at the funding board meeting. That person can heavily sway decision-making so keeping them on side is critical. Also, helping your work shine for them will make it a more pleasant read for everyone - from your peer reviewers to other members of the board who might know very little about your methodological approach or condition of interest. Following this, I will provide both strategic and practical guidance that will help you present your ideas in their best light, and help the lead reviewer find what they need easily. I will end with a few reflections on how to find ways to prioritise time for grant-writing in your busy schedules.

European NeuropsychopharmacologyVol. 111
King's College London (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Research, Science, and Academia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.