Informal food production and trade in South Africa: policy action to bridge inequalities

Drawing on the findings across two project reports, this policy brief seeks to outline practical steps to design and implement fairer, more effective policies for informal food supply in South Africa. It recommends uniform and coherent definitions of informality across every segment of the food production-to-consumption value chain to foster clarity and multiple spinoff benefits. Drawing further on insights from global experiences, it argues that the efficacy, consistency, harmony and coherence of these policies require an integrated food value chain (FVC) lens from the onset (Hara et al., 2025; Mbanda et al., 2025). This allows the brief to engage and propose critical reflection for policymakers as it pertains to regulating FVCs in South Africa towards bridging inequalities. The brief first elaborates and provides substantiation for these claims from the two studies. This outlines the status quo in relation to how FVCs are understood and how informality is regulated to illustrate and highlight more clearly the different nuances, disagreements, and meanings of informality.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Science Research Council SA
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14749/33951772
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Informal food production and trade in South Africa: policy action to bridge inequalities

Human Sciences Research Council
Human Science Research Council SA
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
article

Informal food production and trade in South Africa: policy action to bridge inequalities

Human Sciences Research Council
article en

Abstract

Drawing on the findings across two project reports, this policy brief seeks to outline practical steps to design and implement fairer, more effective policies for informal food supply in South Africa. It recommends uniform and coherent definitions of informality across every segment of the food production-to-consumption value chain to foster clarity and multiple spinoff benefits. Drawing further on insights from global experiences, it argues that the efficacy, consistency, harmony and coherence of these policies require an integrated food value chain (FVC) lens from the onset (Hara et al., 2025; Mbanda et al., 2025). This allows the brief to engage and propose critical reflection for policymakers as it pertains to regulating FVCs in South Africa towards bridging inequalities. The brief first elaborates and provides substantiation for these claims from the two studies. This outlines the status quo in relation to how FVCs are understood and how informality is regulated to illustrate and highlight more clearly the different nuances, disagreements, and meanings of informality.

Human Science Research Council SA
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Informal food production and trade in South Africa: policy action to bridge inequalities — Human Sciences Research Council · Human Science Research Council SA (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS