Minor patients, major differences: why children and adolescents should not have access to voluntary assisted dying

Currently, minors are able to access voluntary assisted dying (VAD) only in three countries – the Netherlands, Belgium and Colombia. Although the uptake by persons under 18 is extremely low, other jurisdictions – particularly Canada and the Australian Capital Territory – are actively exploring whether access to VAD should be extended to mature minors. A clear majority of public opinion in both Canada and the ACT supports allowing mature minors to access VAD. This paper considers the ethical issues involved in permitting minors to access VAD, including: minors’ emerging autonomy and developing cognitive and emotional maturity; their special sensitivity to influence from trusted adults; the role of parental responsibility and authority; and questions of discrimination and equality. It concludes that, given the differences between minors and adults, and the lack of clear, validated measures for assessing capacity and voluntariness, mature minors should not be eligible to access VAD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Ethics
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-026-01582-5
Primary Topic
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Minor patients, major differences: why children and adolescents should not have access to voluntary assisted dying

Katrine Del Villar, Tobias Cantoni
BMC Medical Ethics
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
article

Minor patients, major differences: why children and adolescents should not have access to voluntary assisted dying

Katrine Del Villar, Tobias Cantoni
article en

Abstract

Currently, minors are able to access voluntary assisted dying (VAD) only in three countries – the Netherlands, Belgium and Colombia. Although the uptake by persons under 18 is extremely low, other jurisdictions – particularly Canada and the Australian Capital Territory – are actively exploring whether access to VAD should be extended to mature minors. A clear majority of public opinion in both Canada and the ACT supports allowing mature minors to access VAD. This paper considers the ethical issues involved in permitting minors to access VAD, including: minors’ emerging autonomy and developing cognitive and emotional maturity; their special sensitivity to influence from trusted adults; the role of parental responsibility and authority; and questions of discrimination and equality. It concludes that, given the differences between minors and adults, and the lack of clear, validated measures for assessing capacity and voluntariness, mature minors should not be eligible to access VAD.

BMC Medical Ethics
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.