Cross‐corruption distillation for robust instruction following under text corruptions

Abstract Traditional knowledge distillation transfers information from a large teacher model to a compact student by aligning static output distributions or internal representations for fixed inputs. Such formulations overlook how predictions change in response to input perturbations, even though robustness is critical for deployment. We interpret distillation as the transfer of functional response behavior under input variations and propose cross‐corruption distillation (CCD), which aligns corruption‐induced differences in teacher and student output via a Kullback–Leibler objective. Rather than matching absolute logits, CCD distills how the teacher redistributes its prediction mass under perturbations, transferring teacher‐conditioned input sensitivity without architectural correspondence. On diverse multimodal benchmarks, CCD performs competitively, often outperforming conventional logit‐based distillation. It also slows performance degradation as perturbation strength increases and remains stable across corruption strategies and training schedules. These results position CCD as a response‐aware distillation framework integrating robustness directly into the distillation objective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ETRI Journal
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.2026-0159
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Cross‐corruption distillation for robust instruction following under text corruptions

Kyoungman Bae, Yongjin Bae
ETRI Journal
Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
article

Cross‐corruption distillation for robust instruction following under text corruptions

Kyoungman Bae, Yongjin Bae
article en

Abstract

Abstract Traditional knowledge distillation transfers information from a large teacher model to a compact student by aligning static output distributions or internal representations for fixed inputs. Such formulations overlook how predictions change in response to input perturbations, even though robustness is critical for deployment. We interpret distillation as the transfer of functional response behavior under input variations and propose cross‐corruption distillation (CCD), which aligns corruption‐induced differences in teacher and student output via a Kullback–Leibler objective. Rather than matching absolute logits, CCD distills how the teacher redistributes its prediction mass under perturbations, transferring teacher‐conditioned input sensitivity without architectural correspondence. On diverse multimodal benchmarks, CCD performs competitively, often outperforming conventional logit‐based distillation. It also slows performance degradation as perturbation strength increases and remains stable across corruption strategies and training schedules. These results position CCD as a response‐aware distillation framework integrating robustness directly into the distillation objective.

ETRI Journal
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (KR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.