Exploring sex-specific symptom trajectories in psychosis following metacognitive training (MCT): Evidence from a large-scale retrospective harmonized database

Sex-related differences in the clinical presentation and course of schizophrenia spectrum disorders are increasingly recognized, yet it remains unclear whether biological sex moderates response to psychological interventions. Metacognitive Training for psychosis is an evidence-based psychological intervention targeting cognitive biases associated with psychotic symptoms, but evidence regarding sex-specific treatment effects remain limited. The present study examined whether biological sex influences symptom trajectories following Metacognitive Training in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. We analyzed harmonized retrospective data from an international consortium (PERMEPSY) including participants who received Metacognitive Training for psychosis in routine clinical or research settings. The sample comprised 573 participants diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders across different stages of illness. Control group data was not available due to the retrospective nature of the data and a lack of a standardised control group among included datasets. Psychotic symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, including positive, negative, general, and total symptom scores. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were conducted to examine the effects of time, sex, and their interaction on symptom change. Across the full sample, Metacognitive Training for psychosis was associated with significant reductions in positive, negative, general, and overall psychotic symptoms. However, no significant moderation of symptom change by biological sex was detected, indicating comparable symptom improvement in males and females across all symptom domains. These findings are consistent with prior evidence supporting MCT as a broadly applicable psychological intervention for psychosis, with comparable symptom changes observed in males and females following treatment. Although sex-related differences in baseline symptom profiles were observed, biological sex did not influence the trajectory of symptom change following treatment. These results support the generalizability of Metacognitive Training and point to the relevance of examining more nuanced sex-related factors in future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0356632
Primary Topic
Schizophrenia research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Exploring sex-specific symptom trajectories in psychosis following metacognitive training (MCT): Evidence from a large-scale retrospective harmonized database

Susana Ochoa, Caroline König, A. Gonçalves, María Lamarca et al.
PLoS ONE
Schizophrenia research and treatment
article

Exploring sex-specific symptom trajectories in psychosis following metacognitive training (MCT): Evidence from a large-scale retrospective harmonized database

Susana Ochoa, Caroline König, A. Gonçalves, María Lamarca, Fabrice Berna, Vanessa Acuña, Steffen Moritz, Łukasz Gawęda
article en

Abstract

Sex-related differences in the clinical presentation and course of schizophrenia spectrum disorders are increasingly recognized, yet it remains unclear whether biological sex moderates response to psychological interventions. Metacognitive Training for psychosis is an evidence-based psychological intervention targeting cognitive biases associated with psychotic symptoms, but evidence regarding sex-specific treatment effects remain limited. The present study examined whether biological sex influences symptom trajectories following Metacognitive Training in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. We analyzed harmonized retrospective data from an international consortium (PERMEPSY) including participants who received Metacognitive Training for psychosis in routine clinical or research settings. The sample comprised 573 participants diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders across different stages of illness. Control group data was not available due to the retrospective nature of the data and a lack of a standardised control group among included datasets. Psychotic symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, including positive, negative, general, and total symptom scores. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were conducted to examine the effects of time, sex, and their interaction on symptom change. Across the full sample, Metacognitive Training for psychosis was associated with significant reductions in positive, negative, general, and overall psychotic symptoms. However, no significant moderation of symptom change by biological sex was detected, indicating comparable symptom improvement in males and females across all symptom domains. These findings are consistent with prior evidence supporting MCT as a broadly applicable psychological intervention for psychosis, with comparable symptom changes observed in males and females following treatment. Although sex-related differences in baseline symptom profiles were observed, biological sex did not influence the trajectory of symptom change following treatment. These results support the generalizability of Metacognitive Training and point to the relevance of examining more nuanced sex-related factors in future research.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(9)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Valparaiso University (US), Universität Hamburg (DE), University Medical Center (US), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Institute of Psychology (PL), Sant Joan de Déu Research Foundation (ES), Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu (ES), Université de Strasbourg (FR), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Schizophrenia research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.