Comparing Multi‐Pool Lorentzian Fitting Methods for Guanidinium CEST Quantification in the Human Brain at Clinical 3 T : A Validation Study Using MRS

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of our recently proposed double-step multi-pool Lorentzian fitting (DMPLF) method for extracting GuanCEST and other CEST signals in the human brain at clinical 3 T, using MRS as the reference standard. METHODS: A simulation experiment was conducted to compare the performance of DMPLF with single-step multi-pool Lorentzian fitting (MPLF) based on 5,000 Z-spectra generated using the Bloch-McConnell equation. CEST signals extracted using two methods, including APT, GuanCEST, rNOE(-3.5), and MT, were correlated with the proton concentrations used in the simulation. An in vivo study was conducted in 26 healthy volunteers on a clinical 3 T MRI system. GuanCEST signal extracted using two methods was correlated with MRS-measured total creatine (tCr). Regional analyses based on DMPLF-generated CEST maps were performed to evaluate tissue-specific CEST signal differences between gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM). RESULTS: In simulation, CEST signals extracted by DMPLF demonstrated stronger correlations with the corresponding proton concentrations than those extracted by MPLF. In human study, DMPLF generated high-quality CEST maps, and the extracted GuanCEST signal was significantly correlated with MRS-measured tCr (r = 0.66, p < 0.001). Regional tissue analysis showed significantly higher APT and GuanCEST signals in GM than in WM, and higher rNOE(-3.5) and MT signals in WM than in GM. CONCLUSION: The DMPLF robustly extracts multiple CEST signals, particularly the GuanCEST, which shows a strong correlation with MRS-measured tCr. These findings demonstrate its superior performance over the single-step MPLF method and highlight its potential for quantitative CEST analysis in clinical 3 T MRI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Published
2026-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70599
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparing Multi‐Pool Lorentzian Fitting Methods for Guanidinium CEST Quantification in the Human Brain at Clinical 3 T : A Validation Study Using MRS

Jianpan Huang, Huabin Zhang, Jiawen Wang, Ziyan Wang et al.
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

Comparing Multi‐Pool Lorentzian Fitting Methods for Guanidinium CEST Quantification in the Human Brain at Clinical 3 T : A Validation Study Using MRS

Jianpan Huang, Huabin Zhang, Jiawen Wang, Ziyan Wang, Ying Zhang
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of our recently proposed double-step multi-pool Lorentzian fitting (DMPLF) method for extracting GuanCEST and other CEST signals in the human brain at clinical 3 T, using MRS as the reference standard. METHODS: A simulation experiment was conducted to compare the performance of DMPLF with single-step multi-pool Lorentzian fitting (MPLF) based on 5,000 Z-spectra generated using the Bloch-McConnell equation. CEST signals extracted using two methods, including APT, GuanCEST, rNOE(-3.5), and MT, were correlated with the proton concentrations used in the simulation. An in vivo study was conducted in 26 healthy volunteers on a clinical 3 T MRI system. GuanCEST signal extracted using two methods was correlated with MRS-measured total creatine (tCr). Regional analyses based on DMPLF-generated CEST maps were performed to evaluate tissue-specific CEST signal differences between gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM). RESULTS: In simulation, CEST signals extracted by DMPLF demonstrated stronger correlations with the corresponding proton concentrations than those extracted by MPLF. In human study, DMPLF generated high-quality CEST maps, and the extracted GuanCEST signal was significantly correlated with MRS-measured tCr (r = 0.66, p < 0.001). Regional tissue analysis showed significantly higher APT and GuanCEST signals in GM than in WM, and higher rNOE(-3.5) and MT signals in WM than in GM. CONCLUSION: The DMPLF robustly extracts multiple CEST signals, particularly the GuanCEST, which shows a strong correlation with MRS-measured tCr. These findings demonstrate its superior performance over the single-step MPLF method and highlight its potential for quantitative CEST analysis in clinical 3 T MRI.

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing Multi‐Pool Lorentzian Fitting Methods for Guanidinium CEST Quantification in the Human Brain at Clinical 3 T : A Validation Study Using MRS — Jianpan Huang, Huabin Zhang, et al. · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS