Beautification and obscuration: the unintended consequences of jointly constructed anti-stigma narratives on medical resource inequality for autistic individuals

Abstract Background Neurodiversity emerged from autistic self-advocacy communities in the mid-1990s. Other anti-stigmatization narratives are widely advocated to reduce autism-related stigma. In China, parent-led organizations and charitable organizations have played an indispensable role in challenging discriminatory attitudes and protecting the dignity of autistic individuals and their families, notably through anti-stigma narratives such as “Gūdúzhèng” [literally meaning “autism” with a focus on loneliness, an alternative term to avoid stigma], “children of the stars,” and “genius narrative.” However, the impact of these specific one-sided beautification narrative strategies on access to medical resources and health equity remains under-researched, with limited attention to the potential unintended consequences of such positive narratives. Methods This study adopted a qualitative descriptive research design and selected four cities through purposive sampling. Data collection methods included semi-structured interviews and participant observation. Results The study drew three core conclusions: (1) Disability-removing narratives (such as “Gūdúzhèng”) may inhibit parents from applying for disability certificates for their children, hindering access to medical resources; (2) Homogenized terms (such as “Gūdúzhèng” and “genius”) obscured the heterogeneity of the autism spectrum and comorbid medical needs, reducing the supply of charitable medical resources; (3) Templated charitable fundraising narratives exacerbated the Matthew Effect in the allocation of charitable resources. Conclusion The jointly constructed homogenized and templated beautified narratives of autism are designed to reduce stigma and are pursued with the legitimate goal of safeguarding dignity. However, they inadvertently perpetuate reverse stigmatization and conceal the genuine medical and rehabilitation needs of autistic individuals, contributing to autism-related health inequality. This study emphasizes the urgent need for balanced narrative frameworks that integrate identity, dignity, and explicit recognition of autism spectrum heterogeneity and lifelong support needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Ethics
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-026-01619-9
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Beautification and obscuration: the unintended consequences of jointly constructed anti-stigma narratives on medical resource inequality for autistic individuals

Xiaoli Guo, Xi Wang
BMC Medical Ethics
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

Beautification and obscuration: the unintended consequences of jointly constructed anti-stigma narratives on medical resource inequality for autistic individuals

Xiaoli Guo, Xi Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Neurodiversity emerged from autistic self-advocacy communities in the mid-1990s. Other anti-stigmatization narratives are widely advocated to reduce autism-related stigma. In China, parent-led organizations and charitable organizations have played an indispensable role in challenging discriminatory attitudes and protecting the dignity of autistic individuals and their families, notably through anti-stigma narratives such as “Gūdúzhèng” [literally meaning “autism” with a focus on loneliness, an alternative term to avoid stigma], “children of the stars,” and “genius narrative.” However, the impact of these specific one-sided beautification narrative strategies on access to medical resources and health equity remains under-researched, with limited attention to the potential unintended consequences of such positive narratives. Methods This study adopted a qualitative descriptive research design and selected four cities through purposive sampling. Data collection methods included semi-structured interviews and participant observation. Results The study drew three core conclusions: (1) Disability-removing narratives (such as “Gūdúzhèng”) may inhibit parents from applying for disability certificates for their children, hindering access to medical resources; (2) Homogenized terms (such as “Gūdúzhèng” and “genius”) obscured the heterogeneity of the autism spectrum and comorbid medical needs, reducing the supply of charitable medical resources; (3) Templated charitable fundraising narratives exacerbated the Matthew Effect in the allocation of charitable resources. Conclusion The jointly constructed homogenized and templated beautified narratives of autism are designed to reduce stigma and are pursued with the legitimate goal of safeguarding dignity. However, they inadvertently perpetuate reverse stigmatization and conceal the genuine medical and rehabilitation needs of autistic individuals, contributing to autism-related health inequality. This study emphasizes the urgent need for balanced narrative frameworks that integrate identity, dignity, and explicit recognition of autism spectrum heterogeneity and lifelong support needs.

BMC Medical Ethics
Jilin University (CN), Changchun University of Technology (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.