Financial multilingualism in the South African banking system: an analysis of discrepancies between language policy and corporate practice

This study investigates the implementation of multilingualism and plain language in the South African banking sector, focusing on the discrepancy between language policy and corporate practice. While the Constitution, the National Credit Act, and the Consumer Protection Act mandate equitable language use and understandable consumer information, the findings reveal major implementation gaps in the financial private sector. Where indigenous languages are accommodated, they remain secondary or poorly integrated. English persists as the absolute de facto language for legally binding agreements and complex financial instruments within the corporate and banking industries. Thus, this article introduces the concept of multilinguonomics to examine how linguistic hegemony and the neutral language myth protect corporate convenience at the expense of consumer rights and procedural fairness.Footnote1

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Issues in Language Planning
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2026.2734203
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Financial multilingualism in the South African banking system: an analysis of discrepancies between language policy and corporate practice

Lidon Chauke
Current Issues in Language Planning
Multilingual Education and Policy
article

Financial multilingualism in the South African banking system: an analysis of discrepancies between language policy and corporate practice

Lidon Chauke
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the implementation of multilingualism and plain language in the South African banking sector, focusing on the discrepancy between language policy and corporate practice. While the Constitution, the National Credit Act, and the Consumer Protection Act mandate equitable language use and understandable consumer information, the findings reveal major implementation gaps in the financial private sector. Where indigenous languages are accommodated, they remain secondary or poorly integrated. English persists as the absolute de facto language for legally binding agreements and complex financial instruments within the corporate and banking industries. Thus, this article introduces the concept of multilinguonomics to examine how linguistic hegemony and the neutral language myth protect corporate convenience at the expense of consumer rights and procedural fairness.Footnote1

Current Issues in Language Planning
Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Multilingual Education and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Financial multilingualism in the South African banking system: an analysis of discrepancies between language policy and corporate practice — Lidon Chauke · Current Issues in Language Planning (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS