Positional Blurring in Context: How Dimensionality and Ideology Constrain Strategy

Positional blurring is a common and effective party strategy. It enables parties to downplay some issues while highlighting and clarifying their profile on others. However, we know little about how parties use this strategy outside European party systems, in which (right-wing) populist parties are particularly noteworthy for their blurred economic positions and clear cultural positions. Is that strategy inherent to populism or a reflection of context-specific incentives? This article uses data from Europe and Latin America to argue that populists tailor their strategies to the dimensionality of their party system and populism’s host ideology. We find that multidimensional party systems and exclusionary thick ideologies drive populists to blur their economic positions. Extending this research field beyond Europe for the first time, these findings show that populists are heterogeneous actors whose varied thick ideologies embedded in diverse political systems systematically constrain their strategic behavior.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives on Politics
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592726105805
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Positional Blurring in Context: How Dimensionality and Ideology Constrain Strategy

Jacob R. Gunderson, Nicolás de la Cerda
Perspectives on Politics
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

Positional Blurring in Context: How Dimensionality and Ideology Constrain Strategy

Jacob R. Gunderson, Nicolás de la Cerda
article en

Abstract

Positional blurring is a common and effective party strategy. It enables parties to downplay some issues while highlighting and clarifying their profile on others. However, we know little about how parties use this strategy outside European party systems, in which (right-wing) populist parties are particularly noteworthy for their blurred economic positions and clear cultural positions. Is that strategy inherent to populism or a reflection of context-specific incentives? This article uses data from Europe and Latin America to argue that populists tailor their strategies to the dimensionality of their party system and populism’s host ideology. We find that multidimensional party systems and exclusionary thick ideologies drive populists to blur their economic positions. Extending this research field beyond Europe for the first time, these findings show that populists are heterogeneous actors whose varied thick ideologies embedded in diverse political systems systematically constrain their strategic behavior.

Perspectives on Politics
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Positional Blurring in Context: How Dimensionality and Ideology Constrain Strategy — Jacob R. Gunderson, Nicolás de la Cerda · Perspectives on Politics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS