Attitudes, motivators, and barriers to research participation among medical students in Nepal: a cross-sectional survey

Despite growing global emphasis on research engagement and competency in undergraduate medical education, a persistent gap of high interest in research with low actual participation exists. This gap is particularly pronounced in lower-middle-income countries like Nepal, where research is not yet a formal curricular competency. This study evaluated research interest, participation, motivators and barriers among Nepali undergraduate medical students and examined associations between formal research training and research involvement. This cross-sectional survey was conducted among 319 undergraduate medical students enrolled across government and private medical colleges in Nepal between December 2025 and April 2026, following institutional review committee approval (IRC-NAIHS Registration Number 1452). Participants were recruited via convenience sampling through institutional email lists, social media groups, and student representatives. Data were collected using a validated, self-administered online questionnaire assessing research attitudes, participation, motivators, and perceived barriers, and analyzed using Pearson Chi-square tests with Cramer’s V and the Friedman test with Bonferroni-adjusted post-hoc comparisons, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Out of 319 undergraduate medical students participated in the study (79.9% male; mean age 22.5 ± 2.82 years), only 21.3% had formal research methodology training and 36.9% had participated in research, despite broadly positive attitudes toward research. A supportive mentor (80.3%), desire to learn research skills (84.7%), and financial incentives (87.1%) were the top motivators. Lack of funding was rated the most significant moderate barrier, rated significantly higher than time and mentorship, though not significantly different from inadequate training. Formal research methodology training showed a strong positive association with research participation (χ²=57.794, p < 0.001, Cramer’s V = 0.426), and private college students demonstrated greater research involvement than public college counterparts. Nepali undergraduate medical students demonstrated positive attitudes toward research but exhibited low formal research methodology training and participation rates, with lack of funding, inadequate training, mentorship deficits, and workload identified as key barriers. Given the barriers identified, research training, mentorship, and small grants may help improve engagement, though interventional studies are needed to confirm effectiveness among medical students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10448-8
Primary Topic
Health and Medical Research Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Attitudes, motivators, and barriers to research participation among medical students in Nepal: a cross-sectional survey

Anjan Khadka, Apeksha Aryal, Sammodavardhana Kaundinnyayana, Siddhant Singh Sainthwar et al.
BMC Medical Education
Health and Medical Research Impacts
article

Attitudes, motivators, and barriers to research participation among medical students in Nepal: a cross-sectional survey

Anjan Khadka, Apeksha Aryal, Sammodavardhana Kaundinnyayana, Siddhant Singh Sainthwar, Sachita Khadka, Dharana Kalakheti, Gaurav Jung Shahi
article en

Abstract

Despite growing global emphasis on research engagement and competency in undergraduate medical education, a persistent gap of high interest in research with low actual participation exists. This gap is particularly pronounced in lower-middle-income countries like Nepal, where research is not yet a formal curricular competency. This study evaluated research interest, participation, motivators and barriers among Nepali undergraduate medical students and examined associations between formal research training and research involvement. This cross-sectional survey was conducted among 319 undergraduate medical students enrolled across government and private medical colleges in Nepal between December 2025 and April 2026, following institutional review committee approval (IRC-NAIHS Registration Number 1452). Participants were recruited via convenience sampling through institutional email lists, social media groups, and student representatives. Data were collected using a validated, self-administered online questionnaire assessing research attitudes, participation, motivators, and perceived barriers, and analyzed using Pearson Chi-square tests with Cramer’s V and the Friedman test with Bonferroni-adjusted post-hoc comparisons, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Out of 319 undergraduate medical students participated in the study (79.9% male; mean age 22.5 ± 2.82 years), only 21.3% had formal research methodology training and 36.9% had participated in research, despite broadly positive attitudes toward research. A supportive mentor (80.3%), desire to learn research skills (84.7%), and financial incentives (87.1%) were the top motivators. Lack of funding was rated the most significant moderate barrier, rated significantly higher than time and mentorship, though not significantly different from inadequate training. Formal research methodology training showed a strong positive association with research participation (χ²=57.794, p < 0.001, Cramer’s V = 0.426), and private college students demonstrated greater research involvement than public college counterparts. Nepali undergraduate medical students demonstrated positive attitudes toward research but exhibited low formal research methodology training and participation rates, with lack of funding, inadequate training, mentorship deficits, and workload identified as key barriers. Given the barriers identified, research training, mentorship, and small grants may help improve engagement, though interventional studies are needed to confirm effectiveness among medical students.

BMC Medical Education
Nepalese Army Institute of Health Services (NP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Health and Medical Research Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.