Gendered heuristics and social pressure in infant feeding: a qualitative study of formula choice and legitimation

= 28) underwent a hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis. Four domains emerged: social pressure; technology and risk control; safety in preparation procedures; and legitimation of parental choices. Expectant mothers framed formula as a justifiable last resort; mothers invoked necessity to reconcile formula use with maternal expectations; fathers more often weighed pragmatic needs, professional recommendations, and observed infant outcomes. Social and family expectations could heighten guilt and uncertainty; counseling could legitimize formula use but also reinforce tensions when breastfeeding was treated as the norm. Parents balanced credibility with practicality, prioritizing infant well-being while reflectively considering goals and alternatives. Salient cues could lead to different judgments than structured evaluations. Counseling should therefore explore how parents define responsible feeding, which sources they trust, and which constraints shape feasible choices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Psychology
Published
2026-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053261487802
Primary Topic
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Gendered heuristics and social pressure in infant feeding: a qualitative study of formula choice and legitimation

Márcia Cristina Teixeira Ribeiro Vidigal, Antônio Fernandes de Carvalho, Marco Antônio Silva Alvarenga, Vinícius Rodrigues Arruda Pinto et al.
Journal of Health Psychology
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
article

Gendered heuristics and social pressure in infant feeding: a qualitative study of formula choice and legitimation

Márcia Cristina Teixeira Ribeiro Vidigal, Antônio Fernandes de Carvalho, Marco Antônio Silva Alvarenga, Vinícius Rodrigues Arruda Pinto, Ítalo Tuler Perrone, Kátia Correa Vione
article en

Abstract

= 28) underwent a hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis. Four domains emerged: social pressure; technology and risk control; safety in preparation procedures; and legitimation of parental choices. Expectant mothers framed formula as a justifiable last resort; mothers invoked necessity to reconcile formula use with maternal expectations; fathers more often weighed pragmatic needs, professional recommendations, and observed infant outcomes. Social and family expectations could heighten guilt and uncertainty; counseling could legitimize formula use but also reinforce tensions when breastfeeding was treated as the norm. Parents balanced credibility with practicality, prioritizing infant well-being while reflectively considering goals and alternatives. Salient cues could lead to different judgments than structured evaluations. Counseling should therefore explore how parents define responsible feeding, which sources they trust, and which constraints shape feasible choices.

Journal of Health Psychology
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR), Universidade Federal de Viçosa (BR), Federal University of São João del-Rei (BR), University of Birmingham (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gendered heuristics and social pressure in infant feeding: a qualitative study of formula choice and legitimation — Márcia Cristina Teixeira Ribeiro Vidigal, Antônio Fernandes de Carvalho, et al. · Journal of Health Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS