Trust in context: Examining cognitive control in trust decisions.

{"=":[0],"262)":[1],"in":[2,55,79],"2017-2018":[3],"to":[4,26,90,108],"examine":[5,91],"the":[6,9,12,32,52],"efficacy":[7],"of":[8,14,42],"new":[10],"variant,":[11],"effect":[13],"an":[15],"emotional":[16,56],"distractor":[17,47,53],"on":[18,68],"task":[19],"performance,":[20],"and":[21,96],"individual":[22],"difference":[23],"effects":[24],"related":[25],"social":[27,63],"trust.":[28,110],"We":[29],"found":[30],"that":[31],"Trust-AX":[33,83],"paradigm":[34,84],"provided":[35],"performance":[36],"patterns":[37],"consistent":[38],"with":[39,76,105],"proactive":[40,49,69],"control":[41,50,78,93],"trust":[43,80,95],"decisions.":[44,81],"Adding":[45],"a":[46,72,87],"decreased":[48],"as":[51],"increased":[54],"salience.":[57],"Last,":[58],"individuals":[59],"who":[60],"had":[61],"greater":[62],"distrust":[64],"also":[65],"performed":[66],"worse":[67],"control,":[70],"suggesting":[71],"potential":[73],"shared":[74],"mechanism":[75],"cognitive":[77,92,102],"The":[82],"may":[85],"be":[86],"useful":[88],"measure":[89],"during":[94],"provide":[97],"insights":[98],"into":[99],"how":[100],"\\"cold\\"":[101],"processes":[103,107],"interact":[104],"affective":[106],"influence":[109],"(PsycInfo":[111],"Database":[112],"Record":[113],"(c)":[114],"2026":[115],"APA,":[116],"all":[117],"rights":[118],"reserved).":[119]}

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Emotion
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001741
Primary Topic
Cognitive Functions and Memory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Trust in context: Examining cognitive control in trust decisions.

Angus W. MacDonald, Rebecca Kazinka
Emotion
Cognitive Functions and Memory
article

Trust in context: Examining cognitive control in trust decisions.

Angus W. MacDonald, Rebecca Kazinka
article en

Abstract

= 262) in 2017-2018 to examine the efficacy of the new variant, the effect of an emotional distractor on task performance, and individual difference effects related to social trust. We found that the Trust-AX paradigm provided performance patterns consistent with proactive control of trust decisions. Adding a distractor decreased proactive control as the distractor increased in emotional salience. Last, individuals who had greater social distrust also performed worse on proactive control, suggesting a potential shared mechanism with cognitive control in trust decisions. The Trust-AX paradigm may be a useful measure to examine cognitive control during trust and provide insights into how "cold" cognitive processes interact with affective processes to influence trust. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Emotion
University of Minnesota (US), Twin Cities Orthopedics (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cognitive Functions and Memory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trust in context: Examining cognitive control in trust decisions. — Angus W. MacDonald, Rebecca Kazinka · Emotion (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS