Nurses' Perspectives on Telehealth: Insights From Australian Maternal and Child Health Services

AIM(S): To explore the acceptability, implementation and sustainability of telehealth in a well-child health nursing service. DESIGN: Qualitative interpretive-descriptive design. METHODS: Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants from rural and metropolitan Maternal and Child Health nursing services in Victoria, Australia. Nine online focus groups were conducted with nurses and managers (n = 28) between June and August 2023. Transcripts were analysed inductively using reflexive thematic analysis. Interpretive Description informed the research design and analytic approach, and Fixsen's Implementation Framework guided interpretation of findings. RESULTS: Telehealth was frequently used across the services for individual consultations, follow-up appointments and group programmes, delivered through video and telephone platforms. Participants generally viewed telehealth as acceptable, particularly for group programmes, parent education and maintaining engagement when families were unable to attend in person. However, use was inconsistent and often limited to specific circumstances. Barriers included poor internet connectivity, limited access to devices, reluctance from both families and practitioners, reduced capacity for clinical assessment and concerns about safety, confidentiality and suitability for families with complex needs. Participants identified several strategies to strengthen telehealth delivery. Key implementation drivers included clinical competency (training, guidelines), organisational supports (IT infrastructure and systems integration) and strong leadership from governments and policy bodies. CONCLUSION: Telehealth is increasingly used to improve equity and access, with this study offering insights into its acceptability, implementation and sustainability in maternal and child health nursing. While promising, its long-term success depends on coordinated system planning and context-responsive approaches that support continuity, workforce capacity and relationships. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Impact: This study fills a gap in evidence on telehealth use in well-child health nursing. Telehealth is used in varied ways and is generally acceptable, but providers face persistent barriers to consistent implementation and sustainability. These findings can inform policy, service planning and workforce development to strengthen telehealth-enabled care for families. REPORTING METHOD: This paper has adhered to the EQUATOR guidelines, using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No Patient or Public Contribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Published
2026-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70544
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Nurses' Perspectives on Telehealth: Insights From Australian Maternal and Child Health Services

Leesa Hooker, Kristina Edvardsson, Kim Howland
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

Nurses' Perspectives on Telehealth: Insights From Australian Maternal and Child Health Services

Leesa Hooker, Kristina Edvardsson, Kim Howland
article en

Abstract

AIM(S): To explore the acceptability, implementation and sustainability of telehealth in a well-child health nursing service. DESIGN: Qualitative interpretive-descriptive design. METHODS: Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants from rural and metropolitan Maternal and Child Health nursing services in Victoria, Australia. Nine online focus groups were conducted with nurses and managers (n = 28) between June and August 2023. Transcripts were analysed inductively using reflexive thematic analysis. Interpretive Description informed the research design and analytic approach, and Fixsen's Implementation Framework guided interpretation of findings. RESULTS: Telehealth was frequently used across the services for individual consultations, follow-up appointments and group programmes, delivered through video and telephone platforms. Participants generally viewed telehealth as acceptable, particularly for group programmes, parent education and maintaining engagement when families were unable to attend in person. However, use was inconsistent and often limited to specific circumstances. Barriers included poor internet connectivity, limited access to devices, reluctance from both families and practitioners, reduced capacity for clinical assessment and concerns about safety, confidentiality and suitability for families with complex needs. Participants identified several strategies to strengthen telehealth delivery. Key implementation drivers included clinical competency (training, guidelines), organisational supports (IT infrastructure and systems integration) and strong leadership from governments and policy bodies. CONCLUSION: Telehealth is increasingly used to improve equity and access, with this study offering insights into its acceptability, implementation and sustainability in maternal and child health nursing. While promising, its long-term success depends on coordinated system planning and context-responsive approaches that support continuity, workforce capacity and relationships. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Impact: This study fills a gap in evidence on telehealth use in well-child health nursing. Telehealth is used in varied ways and is generally acceptable, but providers face persistent barriers to consistent implementation and sustainability. These findings can inform policy, service planning and workforce development to strengthen telehealth-enabled care for families. REPORTING METHOD: This paper has adhered to the EQUATOR guidelines, using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No Patient or Public Contribution.

Journal of Clinical Nursing
La Trobe University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.