The Politics of Naming: Silence, Erasure, and the Making of 1971 South Asian History

Abstract South Asian historiography, long dominated by nationalist narratives, has often excluded communities framed as politically inconvenient or non-belonging. By foregrounding the lived experience of the Urdu speaking community in 1971 East Pakistan, this article interprets their marginalization, internment, and historical erasure as manifestations of structural and epistemic violence. Methodologically grounded in oral history and epistemic justice, it proposes “practiced listening” as a counter method for unsilencing, one that engages with what is erased, trivialized, or inaudible in state archives. Reclaiming subaltern memory as a locus of resistance and counter-history, the article redefines the boundaries of critical historical studies to encompass the violence of postcolonial partitions, the condition of statelessness, and the afterlives of displacement. It contributes to interdisciplinary discourses in South Asian studies, memory studies, and postcolonial historiography by advocating for ethically inclusive approaches to remembrance and historical narration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Pakistan studies.
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cps.2026.10023
Primary Topic
South Asian Studies and Diaspora
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Politics of Naming: Silence, Erasure, and the Making of 1971 South Asian History

Aaliyah Tayyebi
Critical Pakistan studies.
South Asian Studies and Diaspora
article

The Politics of Naming: Silence, Erasure, and the Making of 1971 South Asian History

Aaliyah Tayyebi
article en

Abstract

Abstract South Asian historiography, long dominated by nationalist narratives, has often excluded communities framed as politically inconvenient or non-belonging. By foregrounding the lived experience of the Urdu speaking community in 1971 East Pakistan, this article interprets their marginalization, internment, and historical erasure as manifestations of structural and epistemic violence. Methodologically grounded in oral history and epistemic justice, it proposes “practiced listening” as a counter method for unsilencing, one that engages with what is erased, trivialized, or inaudible in state archives. Reclaiming subaltern memory as a locus of resistance and counter-history, the article redefines the boundaries of critical historical studies to encompass the violence of postcolonial partitions, the condition of statelessness, and the afterlives of displacement. It contributes to interdisciplinary discourses in South Asian studies, memory studies, and postcolonial historiography by advocating for ethically inclusive approaches to remembrance and historical narration.

Critical Pakistan studies.
Stockton University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
South Asian Studies and Diaspora
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Politics of Naming: Silence, Erasure, and the Making of 1971 South Asian History — Aaliyah Tayyebi · Critical Pakistan studies. (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS