Egyptian journalists and generative AI adoption: views, anxiety, sustainability, and ethics

The rapid emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming journalism, creating opportunities alongside professional and ethical challenges. This study examines how Egyptian journalists perceive and use GenAI in newsrooms, focusing on workflow, challenges, career sustainability, and ethics. Guided by TAM3 and Bourdieu’s Field Theory, a survey of 72 journalists was conducted. Findings show cautious but practical adoption, with GenAI used mainly for routine tasks such as research and transcription, while editorial decisions remain human-led. Key concerns include accuracy, weak Arabic processing, and limited training. Journalists also fear job displacement, skills obsolescence, and reduced autonomy. Overall, GenAI offers benefits, but its integration is constrained by technical limitations, professional norms, and concerns about the future of journalism, highlighting the need for training and ethical guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Media Practice and Education
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2026.2736886
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Egyptian journalists and generative AI adoption: views, anxiety, sustainability, and ethics

Yousra Allam, Mohamed Mady
Media Practice and Education
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Egyptian journalists and generative AI adoption: views, anxiety, sustainability, and ethics

Yousra Allam, Mohamed Mady
article en

Abstract

The rapid emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming journalism, creating opportunities alongside professional and ethical challenges. This study examines how Egyptian journalists perceive and use GenAI in newsrooms, focusing on workflow, challenges, career sustainability, and ethics. Guided by TAM3 and Bourdieu’s Field Theory, a survey of 72 journalists was conducted. Findings show cautious but practical adoption, with GenAI used mainly for routine tasks such as research and transcription, while editorial decisions remain human-led. Key concerns include accuracy, weak Arabic processing, and limited training. Journalists also fear job displacement, skills obsolescence, and reduced autonomy. Overall, GenAI offers benefits, but its integration is constrained by technical limitations, professional norms, and concerns about the future of journalism, highlighting the need for training and ethical guidelines.

Media Practice and Education
Higher Colleges of Technology (AE), Nile University (UG), New Giza University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.