Safety and Feasibility of Endoscopic-Assisted Electrochemotherapy in Addition to Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: An Exploratory Randomised Clinical Trial

Background: Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has high recurrence rates despite aggressive multimodal treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery. Electrochemotherapy (ECT), combining electroporation with chemotherapy, has shown safety and feasibility in other malignancies, but its role as an additive neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer remains unexplored. Methods: In this parallel-group, randomised safety and feasibility trial, patients with histologically verified LARC who completed neoadjuvant CRT were randomised 1:1 to a single ECT treatment with bleomycin before surgery (n = 8) or standard therapy (n = 8). The primary outcome was safety (amended from the protocol-specified efficacy endpoint after early study termination). Follow-up was scheduled before surgery and at 6 and 12 weeks post-surgery, including adverse events, clinical examination, and patient-reported quality of life, bowel, urinary, and sexual function. Results: ECT was successfully delivered in all treated patients. Median procedure time was 23.5 min. Adverse events occurred in all ECT patients, predominantly rectal pain (86%), with one patient hospitalised for pain management. No procedure-related complications were observed. Two ECT patients had R1 resections due to intraoperative perforations. Tumour response was heterogeneous: two patients achieved complete response (TRG1), three achieved partial response (TRG2–3), and one achieved no response; corresponding numbers in the control group were 2, 4, and 2. One ECT patient achieved clinical complete response and entered a watch-and-wait programme. Patient-reported pain worsened transiently after ECT but returned to baseline by 12 weeks post-surgery. Conclusions: ECT is a technically feasible adjunct to neoadjuvant CRT for LARC. However, its efficacy and safety, particularly regarding surgical complications, remain unclear. Larger trials are needed to determine the role of ECT in multimodal neoadjuvant treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18183066
Primary Topic
Microbial Inactivation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Safety and Feasibility of Endoscopic-Assisted Electrochemotherapy in Addition to Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: An Exploratory Randomised Clinical Trial

Mustafa Orhan Bulut, Rasmus Peuliche Vogelsang, Loan Ngo-Stuyt, Trine Stigaard et al.
Cancers
Microbial Inactivation Methods
article

Safety and Feasibility of Endoscopic-Assisted Electrochemotherapy in Addition to Neoadjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: An Exploratory Randomised Clinical Trial

Mustafa Orhan Bulut, Rasmus Peuliche Vogelsang, Loan Ngo-Stuyt, Trine Stigaard, Adile Orhan, Malene Broholm, Mikail Gögenur, Ismail Gögenür, Julie Gehl, Michael Seiersen, Helle Hjorth Johannesen, Annika Loft
article en

Abstract

Background: Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has high recurrence rates despite aggressive multimodal treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery. Electrochemotherapy (ECT), combining electroporation with chemotherapy, has shown safety and feasibility in other malignancies, but its role as an additive neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer remains unexplored. Methods: In this parallel-group, randomised safety and feasibility trial, patients with histologically verified LARC who completed neoadjuvant CRT were randomised 1:1 to a single ECT treatment with bleomycin before surgery (n = 8) or standard therapy (n = 8). The primary outcome was safety (amended from the protocol-specified efficacy endpoint after early study termination). Follow-up was scheduled before surgery and at 6 and 12 weeks post-surgery, including adverse events, clinical examination, and patient-reported quality of life, bowel, urinary, and sexual function. Results: ECT was successfully delivered in all treated patients. Median procedure time was 23.5 min. Adverse events occurred in all ECT patients, predominantly rectal pain (86%), with one patient hospitalised for pain management. No procedure-related complications were observed. Two ECT patients had R1 resections due to intraoperative perforations. Tumour response was heterogeneous: two patients achieved complete response (TRG1), three achieved partial response (TRG2–3), and one achieved no response; corresponding numbers in the control group were 2, 4, and 2. One ECT patient achieved clinical complete response and entered a watch-and-wait programme. Patient-reported pain worsened transiently after ECT but returned to baseline by 12 weeks post-surgery. Conclusions: ECT is a technically feasible adjunct to neoadjuvant CRT for LARC. However, its efficacy and safety, particularly regarding surgical complications, remain unclear. Larger trials are needed to determine the role of ECT in multimodal neoadjuvant treatment.

CancersVol. 18(18)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Hvidovre Hospital (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Zealand University Hospital (DK), Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (DK), Capital Region of Denmark (DK), Zealand University Hospital Køge (DK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Microbial Inactivation Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.