Confidence and experience trump self-doubt in self-assessed competence amongst clinical psychology trainees

Objective Effective self-assessment is a skill involving evaluation of one’s performance and competence against professional standards. However, several psychological factors can affect self-appraisals of competency. The present study examines the impact of imposterism, professional self-confidence, fear of negative evaluation and hours of direct client experience on competency self-assessment.Method Participants were 74 postgraduate professional psychology students in training. They completed an online survey assessing professional self-confidence, imposterism, fear of negative evaluation, client contact hours and competencies.Results Multiple regression analysis revealed self-assessed competency was significantly predicted by the four variables in the model. Professional self-confidence and direct client contact hours were the strongest predictors.Conclusions Even when direct client experience is accounted for, professional self-confidence appears to play a key role in shaping how trainees evaluate their own competence in professional psychology training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Psychologist
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13284207.2026.2727705
Primary Topic
Counseling Practices and Supervision
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Confidence and experience trump self-doubt in self-assessed competence amongst clinical psychology trainees

Frank Patrick Deane, Judy A. Pickard, Craig J. Gonsalvez, Z. Ulger et al.
Clinical Psychologist
Counseling Practices and Supervision
article

Confidence and experience trump self-doubt in self-assessed competence amongst clinical psychology trainees

Frank Patrick Deane, Judy A. Pickard, Craig J. Gonsalvez, Z. Ulger, A. Hendry
article en

Abstract

Objective Effective self-assessment is a skill involving evaluation of one’s performance and competence against professional standards. However, several psychological factors can affect self-appraisals of competency. The present study examines the impact of imposterism, professional self-confidence, fear of negative evaluation and hours of direct client experience on competency self-assessment.Method Participants were 74 postgraduate professional psychology students in training. They completed an online survey assessing professional self-confidence, imposterism, fear of negative evaluation, client contact hours and competencies.Results Multiple regression analysis revealed self-assessed competency was significantly predicted by the four variables in the model. Professional self-confidence and direct client contact hours were the strongest predictors.Conclusions Even when direct client experience is accounted for, professional self-confidence appears to play a key role in shaping how trainees evaluate their own competence in professional psychology training.

Clinical Psychologist
University of Wollongong (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Counseling Practices and Supervision
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Confidence and experience trump self-doubt in self-assessed competence amongst clinical psychology trainees — Frank Patrick Deane, Judy A. Pickard, et al. · Clinical Psychologist (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS