Confidence and experience trump self-doubt in self-assessed competence amongst clinical psychology trainees
Objective Effective self-assessment is a skill involving evaluation of one’s performance and competence against professional standards. However, several psychological factors can affect self-appraisals of competency. The present study examines the impact of imposterism, professional self-confidence, fear of negative evaluation and hours of direct client experience on competency self-assessment.Method Participants were 74 postgraduate professional psychology students in training. They completed an online survey assessing professional self-confidence, imposterism, fear of negative evaluation, client contact hours and competencies.Results Multiple regression analysis revealed self-assessed competency was significantly predicted by the four variables in the model. Professional self-confidence and direct client contact hours were the strongest predictors.Conclusions Even when direct client experience is accounted for, professional self-confidence appears to play a key role in shaping how trainees evaluate their own competence in professional psychology training.
Authors
- Frank Patrick Deane (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6247-7416)
- Judy A. Pickard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9861-6302)
- Craig J. Gonsalvez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3294-6314)
- Z. Ulger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8872-4072)
- A. Hendry
Institutions
- University of Wollongong (AU)
- Western Sydney University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Clinical Psychologist
- Published
- 2026-09-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13284207.2026.2727705
- Primary Topic
- Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00