How Is Subjecthood Possible: Symmetry, Negativity, and Subjecthood

Full bilingual text and framework available at self-as-an-end.net — Framework reference: self-as-an-end.net/framework.html This is the fourth paper in the Self-as-an-End theory series, providing optional ontological grounding for the preceding three papers. Taking a two-step path — the first scientific, the second ethical — it defines negativity as the macroscopic remainder derived from ontic randomness and describes subjecthood as grounded in negativity, processual rather than static, spectral, and completable only through recognition. The paper advances seven contributions: a scientific definition of negativity, a precise description of subjecthood, a distinction among negativity/subjecthood/consciousness, the identification of the sole discontinuous jump at negativity's emergence, a repositioning of identity continuity as external recognition, a deepening of recognition's structure including its temporal symmetry, and a functional prediction that cosmic symmetry is a necessary background condition for the emergence of subjecthood. A theoretical firewall ensures that if this paper's physical axiom is overturned, the structural theory of the first three papers remains unaffected.The English version is the primary text; the Chinese version is provided as a supplementary file.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22884464
Primary Topic
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

How Is Subjecthood Possible: Symmetry, Negativity, and Subjecthood

Han Qin
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
preprint

How Is Subjecthood Possible: Symmetry, Negativity, and Subjecthood

Han Qin
preprint en

Abstract

Full bilingual text and framework available at self-as-an-end.net — Framework reference: self-as-an-end.net/framework.html This is the fourth paper in the Self-as-an-End theory series, providing optional ontological grounding for the preceding three papers. Taking a two-step path — the first scientific, the second ethical — it defines negativity as the macroscopic remainder derived from ontic randomness and describes subjecthood as grounded in negativity, processual rather than static, spectral, and completable only through recognition. The paper advances seven contributions: a scientific definition of negativity, a precise description of subjecthood, a distinction among negativity/subjecthood/consciousness, the identification of the sole discontinuous jump at negativity's emergence, a repositioning of identity continuity as external recognition, a deepening of recognition's structure including its temporal symmetry, and a functional prediction that cosmic symmetry is a necessary background condition for the emergence of subjecthood. A theoretical firewall ensures that if this paper's physical axiom is overturned, the structural theory of the first three papers remains unaffected.The English version is the primary text; the Chinese version is provided as a supplementary file.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Is Subjecthood Possible: Symmetry, Negativity, and Subjecthood — Han Qin · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS