From waste to resource: The untapped value of the separate collection of single-use laboratory plastics to enable recycling

In the face of the sustainability crisis, scientific laboratories, as resource-intensive units, must conduct research more sustainably. They are estimated to produce 5.5 million tonnes of plastic waste per year. Clearly, there is a need for greater circularity: Reduce-and-reuse frameworks for laboratory plastics exist to some extent, but none for recycling of disposed single-use articles. Biologically contaminated plastics from life science labs are disinfected by autoclaving after use, transforming them into conventional residual waste that is mostly incinerated, resulting in high CO 2 eq. emissions. However, this waste stream consists of high-quality polymers, for which (thermo-)mechanical recycling is technically possible. Therefore, we performed a waste assessment of lab plastics and found in a one-week assessment that the majority of the residual waste consisted of recyclable plastics. However, autoclaving causes these mixed fractions to clump together. Thus, we created a separate collection scheme for the two most abundant plastic types, polystyrene and polypropylene, enabling us to retrieve high-quality monostream polymer fractions for (thermo-)mechanical recycling. This study is the first to present a transferable blueprint with detailed instructions for other institutions on how to implement the separate collection scheme. We obtained user feedback on the feasibility and demonstrated 85% user acceptance. Further, this study provides the first quantitative assessment of emission-saving potential associated with substituting incineration with (thermo-)mechanical recycling for laboratory single-use plastics. For two end-of-life scenarios – an institution-specific scenario at the University of Konstanz (waste incinerated in Weinfelden, Switzerland) and a national average (Germany) scenario – we calculated the average annual emission-saving potentials for the extrapolated amount of arising waste to be up to 10.6 t CO 2 eq. and 7.2 t CO 2 eq., respectively. Therefore, a separate collection of lab plastic waste offers an easy-to-implement measure to reduce incinerated plastic waste, thereby lowering emissions and increasing the sustainability of laboratory research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Sustainability and Transformation
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000225
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

From waste to resource: The untapped value of the separate collection of single-use laboratory plastics to enable recycling

Arooba Nazneen, Bianca R. Schell, Nico Bruns, Anke Weidenkaff et al.
PLOS Sustainability and Transformation
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

From waste to resource: The untapped value of the separate collection of single-use laboratory plastics to enable recycling

Arooba Nazneen, Bianca R. Schell, Nico Bruns, Anke Weidenkaff, Marc Widenmeyer, Ann-Katrin Emmerich
article en

Abstract

In the face of the sustainability crisis, scientific laboratories, as resource-intensive units, must conduct research more sustainably. They are estimated to produce 5.5 million tonnes of plastic waste per year. Clearly, there is a need for greater circularity: Reduce-and-reuse frameworks for laboratory plastics exist to some extent, but none for recycling of disposed single-use articles. Biologically contaminated plastics from life science labs are disinfected by autoclaving after use, transforming them into conventional residual waste that is mostly incinerated, resulting in high CO 2 eq. emissions. However, this waste stream consists of high-quality polymers, for which (thermo-)mechanical recycling is technically possible. Therefore, we performed a waste assessment of lab plastics and found in a one-week assessment that the majority of the residual waste consisted of recyclable plastics. However, autoclaving causes these mixed fractions to clump together. Thus, we created a separate collection scheme for the two most abundant plastic types, polystyrene and polypropylene, enabling us to retrieve high-quality monostream polymer fractions for (thermo-)mechanical recycling. This study is the first to present a transferable blueprint with detailed instructions for other institutions on how to implement the separate collection scheme. We obtained user feedback on the feasibility and demonstrated 85% user acceptance. Further, this study provides the first quantitative assessment of emission-saving potential associated with substituting incineration with (thermo-)mechanical recycling for laboratory single-use plastics. For two end-of-life scenarios – an institution-specific scenario at the University of Konstanz (waste incinerated in Weinfelden, Switzerland) and a national average (Germany) scenario – we calculated the average annual emission-saving potentials for the extrapolated amount of arising waste to be up to 10.6 t CO 2 eq. and 7.2 t CO 2 eq., respectively. Therefore, a separate collection of lab plastic waste offers an easy-to-implement measure to reduce incinerated plastic waste, thereby lowering emissions and increasing the sustainability of laboratory research.

PLOS Sustainability and TransformationVol. 5(9)
University of Strathclyde (GB), University of Konstanz (DE), Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.