Climate change exposure and firm value in China: evidence consistent with a discount-rate interpretation

This paper examines the relationship between firm-level climate change exposure and firm value in China. Using A-share listed firms from 2002 to 2020 and a disclosure-based measure of perceived climate change exposure, we find a significant negative association between climate change exposure and firm value. Our measure provides incremental explanatory power beyond conventional proxies, including ESG indicators and climate change news risk measures. Channel tests provide evidence consistent with a discount-rate interpretation. Both transition and physical-risk exposures are negatively associated with firm value. However, for firms in carbon-neutral industries, transition exposure is positively associated with firm value, consistent with transition-related growth opportunities. The negative associations are more pronounced for firms in high-pollution industries and coastal regions. Further results indicate that the negative valuation association is weaker among firms with stronger green innovation and ESG ratings. Overall, our findings highlight the pricing of climate risk and the role of transition opportunities in firm valuation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-09160-1
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Climate change exposure and firm value in China: evidence consistent with a discount-rate interpretation

Zeng Yu, Weidong Chen, Ruoqi Yao, Jiabao Zhou et al.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Climate change exposure and firm value in China: evidence consistent with a discount-rate interpretation

Zeng Yu, Weidong Chen, Ruoqi Yao, Jiabao Zhou, Hao Liu
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between firm-level climate change exposure and firm value in China. Using A-share listed firms from 2002 to 2020 and a disclosure-based measure of perceived climate change exposure, we find a significant negative association between climate change exposure and firm value. Our measure provides incremental explanatory power beyond conventional proxies, including ESG indicators and climate change news risk measures. Channel tests provide evidence consistent with a discount-rate interpretation. Both transition and physical-risk exposures are negatively associated with firm value. However, for firms in carbon-neutral industries, transition exposure is positively associated with firm value, consistent with transition-related growth opportunities. The negative associations are more pronounced for firms in high-pollution industries and coastal regions. Further results indicate that the negative valuation association is weaker among firms with stronger green innovation and ESG ratings. Overall, our findings highlight the pricing of climate risk and the role of transition opportunities in firm valuation.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Central South University (CN), Tianjin University (CN), Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (CN), Energy Research Institute (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Climate change exposure and firm value in China: evidence consistent with a discount-rate interpretation — Zeng Yu, Weidong Chen, et al. · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS