The correlation between mandibular buccal shelf thickness and different vertical facial patterns: A CBCT study

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between buccal shelf thickness and vertical facial patterns to determine the preferred site for mini-implant placement. Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 90 Iranian adults, aged 22–40 years, were collected from the digital archive of Islamic Azad University (Tehran city, Iran country) and analysed in this retrospective cross-sectional study in order to determine facial patterns. Participants with an ANB angle of 2° ± 2° were divided into low (<27°), average (27°–37°) and high (>37°) vertical groups based on the SN-GoMe angle. Buccal shelf bone thickness was measured at the first and second molars at 6 mm and 11 mm from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ). Data were analysed using the Shapiro–Wilk test, independent and paired t -tests, Pearson correlation and Tukey post-hoc test, with significance set at P < 0.05. Results: Among the 90 participants (39 men, 51 women), no significant sex differences in buccal shelf bone thickness were observed. A significant negative correlation existed between SN-GoMe angle and buccal shelf bone thickness. Buccal bone thickness increased in both the apical and posterior directions; the mean (±SD) thinnest values observed at the distal root of the first molar at 6 mm were 1.03 ± 0.79 mm in males and 1.08 ± 0.90 mm in females, while the mean thickest values were observed at the distal root of the second molar at 11 mm, measuring 4.86 ± 1.59 mm in males and 4.74 ± 1.13 mm in females. Conclusions: Individuals with a low vertical angle tend to exhibit greater buccal shelf bone thickness. The distal aspect of the mandibular second molar at 11 mm from the CEJ appears to be the most favourable site for extra-alveolar mini-implant placement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthodontics
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125261481917
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The correlation between mandibular buccal shelf thickness and different vertical facial patterns: A CBCT study

Reza Morvaridi Farimani, Seyedeh Pegah Mirmalek, Yaser Safi
Journal of Orthodontics
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

The correlation between mandibular buccal shelf thickness and different vertical facial patterns: A CBCT study

Reza Morvaridi Farimani, Seyedeh Pegah Mirmalek, Yaser Safi
article en

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between buccal shelf thickness and vertical facial patterns to determine the preferred site for mini-implant placement. Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 90 Iranian adults, aged 22–40 years, were collected from the digital archive of Islamic Azad University (Tehran city, Iran country) and analysed in this retrospective cross-sectional study in order to determine facial patterns. Participants with an ANB angle of 2° ± 2° were divided into low (<27°), average (27°–37°) and high (>37°) vertical groups based on the SN-GoMe angle. Buccal shelf bone thickness was measured at the first and second molars at 6 mm and 11 mm from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ). Data were analysed using the Shapiro–Wilk test, independent and paired t -tests, Pearson correlation and Tukey post-hoc test, with significance set at P < 0.05. Results: Among the 90 participants (39 men, 51 women), no significant sex differences in buccal shelf bone thickness were observed. A significant negative correlation existed between SN-GoMe angle and buccal shelf bone thickness. Buccal bone thickness increased in both the apical and posterior directions; the mean (±SD) thinnest values observed at the distal root of the first molar at 6 mm were 1.03 ± 0.79 mm in males and 1.08 ± 0.90 mm in females, while the mean thickest values were observed at the distal root of the second molar at 11 mm, measuring 4.86 ± 1.59 mm in males and 4.74 ± 1.13 mm in females. Conclusions: Individuals with a low vertical angle tend to exhibit greater buccal shelf bone thickness. The distal aspect of the mandibular second molar at 11 mm from the CEJ appears to be the most favourable site for extra-alveolar mini-implant placement.

Journal of Orthodontics
University of Louisville (US), Islamic Azad University Dental Branch of Tehran (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR), UConn Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.