Household cost pressure, interest rate hikes, and trust in government

This study examines associations between household cost pressures, monetary tightening, and trust in government in England during 2022-2023. It links repeated cross-sectional TrustTracker data from 17 monthly environments (8894 number of observations) to official ONS Household Costs Indices (HCIs), CPI inflation, and the Bank of England's month-end Bank Rate. The reconstructed design uses the all-households HCI, an official income-decile HCI spread, and an official mortgagor HCI premium as separate quantities; it does not assign a joint income-by-tenure HCI or construct a respondent-specific exposure gap. Models distinguish between-month specifications for monthly main effects from month-fixed-effect specifications for within-month group differentials. Inference uses exact null-imposed WCR-S/WCR31 wild-cluster tests over all 2^{17} Rademacher sign vectors, test-inverted confidence intervals, and Holm adjustment for four pre-specified heterogeneity tests. Under the registered decision rules, none of the four hypotheses is supported. The unrestricted HCI-CPI comparison is imprecise under severe collinearity; the positive Hike estimate does not meet the 5 per cent decision threshold; no mortgage-related interaction is supported; the negative low-income x Hike differential is exploratory because it does not survive Holm correction; and the crisis-minus-stabilization contrast has weak effective monthly support. A constrained aggregate HCI-CPI differential is reported only as a method-sensitive secondary result. The measurement and small-cluster inference corrections materially change the earlier substantive conclusions. The paper's contribution is therefore to demonstrate a transparent, reproducible use of distribution-sensitive official cost measures and to document the inferential limits of a 17-month mixed micro-macro design.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Opus uluslararası toplum araştırmaları dergisi
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1981143
Primary Topic
Economic, financial, and policy analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Household cost pressure, interest rate hikes, and trust in government

Aytuğ Zekeriya Bolcan
Opus uluslararası toplum araştırmaları dergisi
Economic, financial, and policy analysis
article

Household cost pressure, interest rate hikes, and trust in government

Aytuğ Zekeriya Bolcan
article en

Abstract

This study examines associations between household cost pressures, monetary tightening, and trust in government in England during 2022-2023. It links repeated cross-sectional TrustTracker data from 17 monthly environments (8894 number of observations) to official ONS Household Costs Indices (HCIs), CPI inflation, and the Bank of England's month-end Bank Rate. The reconstructed design uses the all-households HCI, an official income-decile HCI spread, and an official mortgagor HCI premium as separate quantities; it does not assign a joint income-by-tenure HCI or construct a respondent-specific exposure gap. Models distinguish between-month specifications for monthly main effects from month-fixed-effect specifications for within-month group differentials. Inference uses exact null-imposed WCR-S/WCR31 wild-cluster tests over all 2^{17} Rademacher sign vectors, test-inverted confidence intervals, and Holm adjustment for four pre-specified heterogeneity tests. Under the registered decision rules, none of the four hypotheses is supported. The unrestricted HCI-CPI comparison is imprecise under severe collinearity; the positive Hike estimate does not meet the 5 per cent decision threshold; no mortgage-related interaction is supported; the negative low-income x Hike differential is exploratory because it does not survive Holm correction; and the crisis-minus-stabilization contrast has weak effective monthly support. A constrained aggregate HCI-CPI differential is reported only as a method-sensitive secondary result. The measurement and small-cluster inference corrections materially change the earlier substantive conclusions. The paper's contribution is therefore to demonstrate a transparent, reproducible use of distribution-sensitive official cost measures and to document the inferential limits of a 17-month mixed micro-macro design.

Opus uluslararası toplum araştırmaları dergisiVol. 23(2026)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Economic, financial, and policy analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.