Transverse Seismic Response of a High-Pier, Long-Span Stiff-Skeleton Arch Bridge Equipped with Transverse Steel Dampers

This study numerically examines the transverse seismic response of a high-pier, long-span stiff-skeleton arch bridge equipped with transverse steel dampers (TSDs). A three-dimensional SAP2000 model represents the primary bridge members predominantly with elastic beam elements. Nonlinear behavior is concentrated in the spherical steel damping bearings (SSDBs), gap links, and idealized TSD links. A sequential staged discrete screening evaluates TSD yield strength, initial gap, and post-yield stiffness ratio using displacement, elastic force-demand, and hysteretic-response indices. Fifteen recorded motions are then used to examine response trends across pulse-period groups. Nine pulse-like records are also decomposed to compare the original motions with their residual components. Within the predefined candidates, 3000 kN, 150 mm, and 15% provide the selected balance among the adopted response indices. This combination is conditional on the candidate set, stage order, bridge model, and input motions, and is not a global multi-parameter optimum. An additional 15-record check of the 13 unique parameter configurations found that no candidate minimized representative bearing, pier, and arch responses simultaneously. This supports interpreting the retained values as a conditional compromise. Exploratory record-level tests identify false-discovery-rate-controlled group differences for pier-top displacement, arch-rib displacement, and arch-rib bending moment; most force-demand indices do not show resolved group differences in this small set. In the nine paired original–residual comparisons, median peak-response reductions range from 16.8% for pier-base shear to 76.9% for arch-rib bending moment, although the pier-base shear change is not statistically resolved. These findings provide comparative numerical demand trends for the investigated bridge. They do not constitute member-capacity verification, physical-device validation, or a general seismic-safety assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16183750
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Transverse Seismic Response of a High-Pier, Long-Span Stiff-Skeleton Arch Bridge Equipped with Transverse Steel Dampers

Bo Jiang, Huaping Yang, Linxi Duan, Ruifeng Yu et al.
Buildings
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Transverse Seismic Response of a High-Pier, Long-Span Stiff-Skeleton Arch Bridge Equipped with Transverse Steel Dampers

Bo Jiang, Huaping Yang, Linxi Duan, Ruifeng Yu, Changjiang Shao, Zhizhong Li, Qiming Qi
article en

Abstract

This study numerically examines the transverse seismic response of a high-pier, long-span stiff-skeleton arch bridge equipped with transverse steel dampers (TSDs). A three-dimensional SAP2000 model represents the primary bridge members predominantly with elastic beam elements. Nonlinear behavior is concentrated in the spherical steel damping bearings (SSDBs), gap links, and idealized TSD links. A sequential staged discrete screening evaluates TSD yield strength, initial gap, and post-yield stiffness ratio using displacement, elastic force-demand, and hysteretic-response indices. Fifteen recorded motions are then used to examine response trends across pulse-period groups. Nine pulse-like records are also decomposed to compare the original motions with their residual components. Within the predefined candidates, 3000 kN, 150 mm, and 15% provide the selected balance among the adopted response indices. This combination is conditional on the candidate set, stage order, bridge model, and input motions, and is not a global multi-parameter optimum. An additional 15-record check of the 13 unique parameter configurations found that no candidate minimized representative bearing, pier, and arch responses simultaneously. This supports interpreting the retained values as a conditional compromise. Exploratory record-level tests identify false-discovery-rate-controlled group differences for pier-top displacement, arch-rib displacement, and arch-rib bending moment; most force-demand indices do not show resolved group differences in this small set. In the nine paired original–residual comparisons, median peak-response reductions range from 16.8% for pier-base shear to 76.9% for arch-rib bending moment, although the pier-base shear change is not statistically resolved. These findings provide comparative numerical demand trends for the investigated bridge. They do not constitute member-capacity verification, physical-device validation, or a general seismic-safety assessment.

BuildingsVol. 16(18)
Chengdu University (CN), China Railway Group (China) (CN), Southwest Jiaotong University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.