Biogas separation employing sII and sH promoters coupled with kinetic additives: Investigation of hydrate formation/dissociation kinetics

Biogas separation is essential for producing high purity CH 4 as a clean fuel while enabling CO 2 capture within carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS). However, insufficient separation can result in methane losses and incomplete CO 2 capture, undermining climate benefits by high impact CH 4 emissions with continued CO 2 release. Hydrate based gas separation (HBGS) can be a potential solution for this purpose. The successful application of hydrate-based biogas storage depends on resolving the challenge of slow formation kinetics by developing methods that can effectively accelerate hydrate onset and growth. Thermodynamic additives (Tetrahydrofuran (THF), Cyclopentane (CP), 1,3 Dioxolane (DIOX) [forming sII structure] and Tetrabutyl methyl ether(TBME) [forming sH structure] at their stoichiometric concentrations alongside combinations with kinetic additives were employed to separate 24.8 mol% CO 2 / 74.2 mol% CH 4 (biogas) mixture at 4.7 MPa and 283.2 K. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and piperazine were also tested in combination for their effect on formation kinetics and separation efficiency. Highest gas uptake of 102.72 ± 5.12 mmol/mol was obtained using 2.86 mol% TBME with 0.1 wt% l-leucine. Selective separation ability of TBME forming sH hydrate was found to be higher compared to THF, CP and DIOX (structure sII hydrates) as it demonstrated highest separation factor of 2.45 ± 0.1, employing 2.86 mol% TBME with 5 wt% piperazine. DIOX sII mixed hydrate showed better performance compared to THF and CP in terms of gas uptake and rate of hydrate formation specifically in combination with l-methionine. Dissociation study of mixed hydrates with morphological observations show case higher thermodynamic stability of CP compared to THF and DIOX, other sII promoters. Overall, this work provides the systematic comprehensive evaluation of sII and sH promoters integrated with different bio-additives, advancing HBGS as a viable strategy for simultaneous methane enrichment and CO 2 capture with reduced environmental impact aligning with United Nations sustainable development goals (SDGs) of 7 and 13.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2026.141320
Primary Topic
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Biogas separation employing sII and sH promoters coupled with kinetic additives: Investigation of hydrate formation/dissociation kinetics

Hari Prakash Veluswamy, Chandrajit Balomajumder, Amit Singh
Fuel
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
article

Biogas separation employing sII and sH promoters coupled with kinetic additives: Investigation of hydrate formation/dissociation kinetics

Hari Prakash Veluswamy, Chandrajit Balomajumder, Amit Singh
article en

Abstract

Biogas separation is essential for producing high purity CH 4 as a clean fuel while enabling CO 2 capture within carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS). However, insufficient separation can result in methane losses and incomplete CO 2 capture, undermining climate benefits by high impact CH 4 emissions with continued CO 2 release. Hydrate based gas separation (HBGS) can be a potential solution for this purpose. The successful application of hydrate-based biogas storage depends on resolving the challenge of slow formation kinetics by developing methods that can effectively accelerate hydrate onset and growth. Thermodynamic additives (Tetrahydrofuran (THF), Cyclopentane (CP), 1,3 Dioxolane (DIOX) [forming sII structure] and Tetrabutyl methyl ether(TBME) [forming sH structure] at their stoichiometric concentrations alongside combinations with kinetic additives were employed to separate 24.8 mol% CO 2 / 74.2 mol% CH 4 (biogas) mixture at 4.7 MPa and 283.2 K. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and piperazine were also tested in combination for their effect on formation kinetics and separation efficiency. Highest gas uptake of 102.72 ± 5.12 mmol/mol was obtained using 2.86 mol% TBME with 0.1 wt% l-leucine. Selective separation ability of TBME forming sH hydrate was found to be higher compared to THF, CP and DIOX (structure sII hydrates) as it demonstrated highest separation factor of 2.45 ± 0.1, employing 2.86 mol% TBME with 5 wt% piperazine. DIOX sII mixed hydrate showed better performance compared to THF and CP in terms of gas uptake and rate of hydrate formation specifically in combination with l-methionine. Dissociation study of mixed hydrates with morphological observations show case higher thermodynamic stability of CP compared to THF and DIOX, other sII promoters. Overall, this work provides the systematic comprehensive evaluation of sII and sH promoters integrated with different bio-additives, advancing HBGS as a viable strategy for simultaneous methane enrichment and CO 2 capture with reduced environmental impact aligning with United Nations sustainable development goals (SDGs) of 7 and 13.

FuelVol. 430
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.