Observing trust: a second-order cybernetics model of organisational trust in AI-driven decision systems

Purpose Organizations increasingly delegate consequential decisions to artificial intelligence (AI), yet trust in these systems remains fragile, poorly understood and resistant to purely technical fixes. Existing research treats trust as a measurable property of the human–AI dyad, neglecting the recursive observations through which trust is actually produced and stabilized in organizational life. This paper develops a second-order cybernetics model that reframes trust as a self-referential, socially recursive phenomenon. Design/methodology/approach The study is a conceptual, theory-building analysis grounded in Von Foerster's second-order cybernetics, Luhmann's social systems theory and the concept of autopoiesis. The model is derived through a four-stage analytical procedure: (1) decentring the trustee, (2) mapping the recursive observer network, (3) incorporating autopoietic closure and (4) synthesising three core functions. Validity is assessed against criteria of conceptual coherence and generative adequacy. Findings The model comprises three interlocking functions: the Observer Function (O), describing how an actor draws a trust/distrust distinction; the Social Recursion Function (R), capturing how that distinction re-enters the communication network and the Stabilisation Function (S), explaining how repeated recursion locks the system into a trust regime or distrust regime (eigenbehavior). A key novel argument is that modern adaptive AI systems constitute a co-evolving recursive trust ecology with their human observers. Originality/value The paper brings second-order cybernetics into systematic conversation with the AI-trust literature, which has remained largely first-order. It extends Luhmann's recursive trust theory into the domain of human–AI recursive observation ecologies, where AI systems adapt to user trust signals. It provides actionable implications for management, system design and governance that target the recursive network rather than the technology alone, with explicit engagement with the EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001 and the NIST AI RMF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kybernetes
Published
2026-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/k-05-2026-1124
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Observing trust: a second-order cybernetics model of organisational trust in AI-driven decision systems

Mohsin Rasheed
Kybernetes
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Observing trust: a second-order cybernetics model of organisational trust in AI-driven decision systems

Mohsin Rasheed
article en

Abstract

Purpose Organizations increasingly delegate consequential decisions to artificial intelligence (AI), yet trust in these systems remains fragile, poorly understood and resistant to purely technical fixes. Existing research treats trust as a measurable property of the human–AI dyad, neglecting the recursive observations through which trust is actually produced and stabilized in organizational life. This paper develops a second-order cybernetics model that reframes trust as a self-referential, socially recursive phenomenon. Design/methodology/approach The study is a conceptual, theory-building analysis grounded in Von Foerster's second-order cybernetics, Luhmann's social systems theory and the concept of autopoiesis. The model is derived through a four-stage analytical procedure: (1) decentring the trustee, (2) mapping the recursive observer network, (3) incorporating autopoietic closure and (4) synthesising three core functions. Validity is assessed against criteria of conceptual coherence and generative adequacy. Findings The model comprises three interlocking functions: the Observer Function (O), describing how an actor draws a trust/distrust distinction; the Social Recursion Function (R), capturing how that distinction re-enters the communication network and the Stabilisation Function (S), explaining how repeated recursion locks the system into a trust regime or distrust regime (eigenbehavior). A key novel argument is that modern adaptive AI systems constitute a co-evolving recursive trust ecology with their human observers. Originality/value The paper brings second-order cybernetics into systematic conversation with the AI-trust literature, which has remained largely first-order. It extends Luhmann's recursive trust theory into the domain of human–AI recursive observation ecologies, where AI systems adapt to user trust signals. It provides actionable implications for management, system design and governance that target the recursive network rather than the technology alone, with explicit engagement with the EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001 and the NIST AI RMF.

Kybernetes
Zhengzhou University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Observing trust: a second-order cybernetics model of organisational trust in AI-driven decision systems — Mohsin Rasheed · Kybernetes (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS